These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9775367)

  • 21. [Wiener spectra of roentgen film-screen combinations].
    Mirandé W; Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Mar; 38(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 3992138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dependence of radiographic mottle on beam quality.
    Barnes GT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 973671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prospects for x-ray exposure reduction using rare earth intensifying screens.
    Wagner RF; Weaver KE
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 1244656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using light sensitometry to evaluate mammography film performance.
    West MS; Spelic DC
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):854-60. PubMed ID: 10841387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film system and third generation computed radiography.
    Cook LT; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Cox GG
    Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 7935205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography.
    Yoshimura H; Xu XW; Doi K; MacMahon H; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Montner SM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8455513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
    Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Describing the signal-transfer characteristics of asymmetrical radiographic screen-film systems.
    Van Metter R
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 1620058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of fractal dimension in radiographs.
    Veenland JF; Grashius JL; van der Meer F; Beckers AL; Gelsema ES
    Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 8860906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.
    Schmidt RA; Doi K; Sekiya M; Xu XW; Giger ML; Lu CT; Mojtahedi S; MacMahon H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anticrossover emulsions evaluated by observer performance tests.
    Kelsey CA; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Garcia JF; Parker TW; Juhl JH; Briscoe DE
    Radiology; 1983 Jan; 146(1):209-11. PubMed ID: 6849047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance.
    Haus AG
    Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fast Fourier digital quantum mottle analysis with application to rare earth intensifying screen systems.
    Wagner RF
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 850512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Absolute speeds of screen-film systems and their absorbed-energy constants.
    Kodera Y; Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 6701320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Low-frequency Wiener spectra of radiographic screen-film systems.
    Wolf M; Angerstein W
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 May; 32(5):557-64. PubMed ID: 3588669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of contrast in duplicated radiographs.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Dec; 54(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 6961348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.