115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9775377)
1. Effects of changes in stopping-power ratios with field size on electron beam relative output factors.
Zhang GG; Rogers DW; Cygler JE; Mackie TR
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1711-6. PubMed ID: 9775377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculation of stopping-power ratios using realistic clinical electron beams.
Ding GX; Rogers DW; Mackie TR
Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 7643785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements of output factors with different detector types and Monte Carlo calculations of stopping-power ratios for degraded electron beams.
Björk P; Knöös T; Nilsson P
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(19):4493-506. PubMed ID: 15552413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
Ding GX; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurements of electron beam peak scatter factors.
Ding GX; Cygler JE
Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 9507489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo-based investigations on the impact of removing the flattening filter on beam quality specifiers for photon beam dosimetry.
Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 28369978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Monte Carlo methods to commission electron beams: a feasibility study.
Antolak JA; Bieda MR; Hogstrom KR
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):771-86. PubMed ID: 12033573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo calculation of output factors for circular, rectangular, and square fields of electron accelerators (6-20 MeV).
Verhaegen F; Mubata C; Pettingell J; Bidmead AM; Rosenberg I; Mockridge D; Nahum AE
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):938-49. PubMed ID: 11439490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo calculated correction factors for diodes and ion chambers in small photon fields.
Czarnecki D; Zink K
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(8):2431-44. PubMed ID: 23514734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
Cross P; Freeman N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte Carlo study on internal wedges using BEAM.
van der Zee W; Welleweerd J
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 12033584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between %dd(10)x and stopping-power ratios for flattening filter free accelerators: a Monte Carlo study.
Xiong G; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2104-9. PubMed ID: 18561686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate characterization of Monte Carlo calculated electron beams for radiotherapy.
Ma CM; Faddegon BA; Rogers DW; Mackie TR
Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):401-16. PubMed ID: 9089592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electron beam modeling and commissioning for Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Jiang SB; Kapur A; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):180-91. PubMed ID: 10659756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose measurements compared with Monte Carlo simulations of narrow 6 MV multileaf collimator shaped photon beams.
De Vlamynck K; Palmans H; Verhaegen F; De Wagter C; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1874-82. PubMed ID: 10505876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic confinement of electron and photon radiotherapy dose: a Monte Carlo simulation with a nonuniform longitudinal magnetic field.
Chen Y; Bielajew AF; Litzenberg DW; Moran JM; Becchetti FD
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3810-8. PubMed ID: 16475781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cone design on the electron beam characteristics on clinical accelerators.
Kassaee A; Altschuler MD; Ayyalsomayajula S; Bloch P
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1671-6. PubMed ID: 7891626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of field size on stopping-power ratios in- and out-of-field: quantitative data for the BrainLAB m3 micro-multileaf collimator.
Taylor M; Kairn T; Kron T; Dunn L; Johnston PN; Franich RD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 13(6):4019. PubMed ID: 23149796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
