These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9775742)

  • 1. Measuring the intervention in effectiveness research.
    Sidani S
    West J Nurs Res; 1998 Oct; 20(5):621-35. PubMed ID: 9775742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring constructs.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(4):254, 269. PubMed ID: 18807860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pragmatic trials: is this a useful method in nursing research?
    King KM; Thompson DR
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jun; 17(11):1401-2. PubMed ID: 18482137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The statistical versus clinical significance debate.
    LeFort SM
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1993; 25(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 8240480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing the validity of research results with a blend of laboratory and clinical strategies.
    Topf M
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1990; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 2194935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Benefit assessment in nursing research: illustrative examples and questions left unanswered].
    Bartholomeyczik S
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 23790705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding clinical trial outcomes: design, analysis, and interpretation.
    Jacobe HT; Leitenberger JJ; Bergstresser PR
    Dermatol Ther; 2007; 20(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 17537135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threats to validity in randomized clinical trials.
    Fogg L; Gross D
    Res Nurs Health; 2000 Feb; 23(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 10686575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a wound dressing using different research methods.
    Reynolds T; Russell L
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Jun; 13(11):S21-4. PubMed ID: 15228025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A beginner's picture of research (IV). Experimental research methods.
    Rothwell H
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Mar; 2(3):32-5. PubMed ID: 10382531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of a decade of critical care nursing practice research: 1979 to 1988.
    VanCott ML; Tittle MB; Moody LE; Wilson ME
    Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 1830043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Outcomes in randomized trials: Typology, relevance and importance for their standardization. Example of renoprotection].
    Sautenet B; Halimi JM; Caille A; Giraudeau B
    Presse Med; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1096-102. PubMed ID: 26454307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Original Research: Implementation of an Early Mobility Program in an ICU.
    Fraser D; Spiva L; Forman W; Hallen C
    Am J Nurs; 2015 Dec; 115(12):49-58. PubMed ID: 26600359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention.
    Yamada J; Stevens B; Sidani S; Watt-Watson J; de Silva N
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2010 Sep; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 20180940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of nursing practice: process and critique.
    Braunstein MS
    Nurs Sci Q; 1998; 11(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 10036460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Gold standards for scientific proof of efficacy and effectiveness as prerequisites for the dissemination of intervention programs in the field of early intervention. Randomized controlled trials].
    Lengning A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1056-60. PubMed ID: 20936449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Fox guarding the clinical trial: internal vs. external validity in randomized studies.
    Goodwin PJ; Pritchard KI; Spiegel D
    Psychooncology; 1999; 8(3):275. PubMed ID: 10390742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of treatment preferences on validity: a review.
    Sidani S; Miranda J; Epstein D; Fox M
    Can J Nurs Res; 2009 Dec; 41(4):52-67. PubMed ID: 20191713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explanations for improvement in both experimental and control groups.
    Becker H; Roberts G; Voelmeck W
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Oct; 25(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 14528620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.