307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9776024)
1. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Remodelling of periodontal tissues adjacent to sites treated according to the principles of guided tissue regeneration (GTR).
Brägger U; Hämmerle CH; Mombelli A; Bürgin W; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 19(9 Pt 1):615-24. PubMed ID: 1430288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images.
Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of radiographic methods in assessing the outcome of periodontal regenerative therapy.
Toback GA; Brunsvold MA; Nummikoski PV; Masters LB; Mellonig JT; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1479-89. PubMed ID: 10632524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative analysis of bone density in direct digital radiographs evaluated by means of computerized analysis of digital images.
Morea C; Dominguez GC; Coutinho A; Chilvarquer I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 20729185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissue changes.
Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Jun; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 7918909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis in periodontal radiography. A methodological study.
Brägger U; Pasquali L; Rylander H; Carnes D; Kornman KS
J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Jan; 15(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 3276740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro.
Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 8038343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence for healing of class II and III furcations after GTR therapy: digital subtraction and clinical measurements.
Eickholz P; Hausmann E
J Periodontol; 1997 Jul; 68(7):636-44. PubMed ID: 9249635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cigarette smoking and alveolar bone in young adults: a study using digitized radiographs.
Rosa GM; Lucas GQ; Lucas ON
J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):232-44. PubMed ID: 18251656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro calibration and validation of a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images.
Woo BM; Zee KY; Chan FH; Corbet EF
J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Feb; 30(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12622852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic absorptiometry method in measurement of localized alveolar bone density changes.
Kuhl ED; Nummikoski PV
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 10710466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 5 protocols based on their abilities to use data extracted from digitized clinical radiographs to discriminate between patients with gingivitis and periodontitis.
Shrout MK; Hildebolt CF; Potter BJ; Comer RW
J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1750-5. PubMed ID: 11128924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correction of density changes caused by methodological errors in CADIA.
Steffensen B; Pasquali LA; Yuan C; Wood RC; Schoolfield JD; Kornman KS
J Periodontal Res; 1989 Nov; 24(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 2531795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) of bone density in periradicular bone defects healing.
Katanec D; Kobler P; Slaj M; Anić I; Milosak T
Coll Antropol; 1998 Dec; 22 Suppl():7-13. PubMed ID: 9951134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of 2 patient populations using fractal analysis.
Shrout MK; Roberson B; Potter BJ; Mailhot JM; Hildebolt CF
J Periodontol; 1998 Jan; 69(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9527567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of chlorhexidine (0.12%) rinses on periodontal tissue healing after tooth extraction. (II). Radiographic parameters.
Brägger U; Schild U; Lang NP
J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Jul; 21(6):422-30. PubMed ID: 8089245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphologic operations used to distinguish between two patient populations differing in periodontal health.
Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Mailhot JM; Hildebolt CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 9540094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
