368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9778932)
21. A quantitative method for evaluating the detectability of lesions in digital mammography.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):214-8. PubMed ID: 18319282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visibility of microcalcifications in computed and screen-film mammography.
Cowen AR; Launders JH; Jadav M; Brettle DS
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Aug; 42(8):1533-48. PubMed ID: 9279904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Méndez AJ; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1385-94. PubMed ID: 9304566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
Shaw CC; Wang T; King JL; Breitenstein DS; Chang TS; Harris KM; Baratz AB; Ganott MA; Reginella R; Sumkin JH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography].
Horino K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images.
McLoughlin KJ; Bones PJ; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 15027524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review.
Øynes M; Strøm B; Tveito B; Hafslund B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4223-4233. PubMed ID: 32222798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen-film, and digitized film display.
Smathers RL; Bush E; Drace J; Stevens M; Sommer FG; Brown BW; Karras B
Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 3704149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved microcalcification visualization using dual-energy digital mammography.
Tsai CJ; Chen RC; Peng HL; Hsu WL; Lee JJ
Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 23528569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. DIMA enlargement mammography in microcalcifications: a prospective study with ROC analysis.
Grunert JH; Barbey M; Berndt G; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E; Ratmann R; Rautmann B
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 11218029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analogic versus digital mammographic examination a radiological study of mammary microcalcifications on 52 surgical samples.
Di Nubila B; Cassano E; Origgi D; Treviganti R; Bozzini A; Cernigliaro F; Faissola B; Meneghetti L; Renne G; Balestreri N; Luini A; Bellomi M
Radiol Med; 2003 Oct; 106(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 14612821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial resolution in digital mammography.
Karssemeijer N; Frieling JT; Hendriks JH
Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 8496034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
