277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9779223)
1. Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts.
Czosnyka Z; Czosnyka M; Richards H; Pickard JD
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():334-9. PubMed ID: 9779223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory testing of hydrocephalus shunts -- conclusion of the U.K. Shunt evaluation programme.
Czosnyka Z; Czosnyka M; Richards HK; Pickard JD
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Jun; 144(6):525-38; discussion 538. PubMed ID: 12111485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posture-related overdrainage: comparison of the performance of 10 hydrocephalus shunts in vitro.
Czosnyka Z; Czosnyka M; Richards HK; Pickard JD
Neurosurgery; 1998 Feb; 42(2):327-33; discussion 333-4. PubMed ID: 9482183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shunt testing in-vivo: a method based on the data from the UK shunt evaluation laboratory.
Czosnyka ZH; Czosnyka M; Pickard JD
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2002; 81():27-30. PubMed ID: 12168323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Four-year experience with the routine use of the programmable Hakim valve in the management of children with hydrocephalus.
Rohde V; Mayfrank L; Ramakers VT; Gilsbach JM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1998; 140(11):1127-34. PubMed ID: 9870057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of shunt implantations using Sophy programmable pressure valves: comparison with Codman-Hakim programmable valves.
Katano H; Karasawa K; Sugiyama N; Yamashita N; Ohkura A; Kamiya K
J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 10(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 12948459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An adjustable CSF shunt: advices for clinical use.
Lundkvist B; Eklund A; Koskinen LO; Malm J
Acta Neurol Scand; 2003 Jul; 108(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 12807391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcutaneous pressure-adjustable valves and magnetic resonance imaging: an ex vivo examination of the Codman-Medos programmable valve and the Sophy adjustable pressure valve.
Ortler M; Kostron H; Felber S
Neurosurgery; 1997 May; 40(5):1050-7; discussion 1057-8. PubMed ID: 9149264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overdrainage and shunt technology. A critical comparison of programmable, hydrostatic and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices.
Aschoff A; Kremer P; Benesch C; Fruh K; Klank A; Kunze S
Childs Nerv Syst; 1995 Apr; 11(4):193-202. PubMed ID: 7621479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts: United Kingdom Shunt Evaluation Laboratory.
Czosnyka M; Czosnyka Z; Whitehouse H; Pickard JD
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1997 Jan; 62(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 9010399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Hakim-Medos Investigator Group.
Pollack IF; Albright AL; Adelson PD
Neurosurgery; 1999 Dec; 45(6):1399-408; discussion 1408-11. PubMed ID: 10598708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging on various pressure programmable shunt valves.
Inoue T; Kuzu Y; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
J Neurosurg; 2005 Aug; 103(2 Suppl):163-5. PubMed ID: 16370283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posture-independent piston valve: a novel valve mechanism that actuates based on intracranial pressure alone.
Medow JE; Luzzio CC
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2012 Jan; 9(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 22208323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Telemetric assessment of intracranial pressure changes consequent to manipulations of the Codman-Medos programmable shunt valve.
Frim DM; Lathrop D
Pediatr Neurosurg; 2000 Nov; 33(5):237-242. PubMed ID: 11155059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt dynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome.
Malm J; Kristensen B; Fagerlund M; Koskinen LO; Ekstedt J
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1995 Jun; 58(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 7608674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency and causes of shunt revisions in different cerebrospinal fluid shunt types.
Borgbjerg BM; Gjerris F; Albeck MJ; Hauerberg J; Børgesen SE
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1995; 136(3-4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8748853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The programmable shunt-system Codman Medos Hakim: A clinical observation study and review of literature.
Nowak S; Mehdorn HM; Stark A
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Oct; 173():154-158. PubMed ID: 30142621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluid flow performance of a new siphon-control device for ventricular shunts.
Horton D; Pollay M
J Neurosurg; 1990 Jun; 72(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 2338577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical survey of hydrocephalus and current treatment for hydrocephalus in Japan: analysis by nationwide questionnaire.
Miyake H; Ohta T; Kajimoto Y; Ogawa D
Childs Nerv Syst; 1999 Aug; 15(8):363-8. PubMed ID: 10447603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CSF outflow resistance as predictor of shunt function. A long-term study.
Malm J; Lundkvist B; Eklund A; Koskinen LO; Kristensen B
Acta Neurol Scand; 2004 Sep; 110(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 15285771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
