These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9779347)

  • 21. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma.
    Shapiro RS
    Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Overtreatment of neonates.
    Fleischman AR
    Pediatrics; 1993 Jan; 91(1):169. PubMed ID: 8416497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical decisions in the delivery room.
    Goldsmith JP; Ginsberg HG; McGettigan MC
    Clin Perinatol; 1996 Sep; 23(3):529-50. PubMed ID: 8884125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.
    Waldman AM
    J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):890-2. PubMed ID: 11662999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parental role in medical decision-making: fact or fiction? A comparative study of ethical dilemmas in French and American neonatal intensive care units.
    Orfali K
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):2009-22. PubMed ID: 15020016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights.
    Knezevich CA
    Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Care of the hopelessly ill.
    Paris JJ; Varga AC
    America (NY); 1984 Sep; 151(7):141-4. PubMed ID: 11658463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of patient incompetence on decisions to use or withhold life-sustaining treatment.
    Hanson LC; Danis M; Mutran E; Keenan NL
    Am J Med; 1994 Sep; 97(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 8092172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
    Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reflections on the withdrawal of treatment from newborn infants.
    Richards MP
    Early Hum Dev; 1989 Feb; 18(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 2702951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Involving parents in decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment for critically ill infants and children.
    Rushton CH; Glover JJ
    AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs; 1990 May; 1(1):206-14. PubMed ID: 2357440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn.
    Tripp J; McGregor D
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2006 Jan; 91(1):F67-71. PubMed ID: 16371392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shared decision making: the ethics of caring and best respect.
    Beltran JE
    Bioethics Forum; 1996; 12(3):17-25. PubMed ID: 11660305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Moral decisions in medical situations.
    Weber LJ
    New Cathol World; 1976; 219(1313):214-7. PubMed ID: 11662305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: substituted judgment, informed consent, and the Quinlan decision.
    Sargeant KJ
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1978; 13(3):781-811. PubMed ID: 11664980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The physician's dilemma: a doctor's view--what the law should be.
    Teel K
    Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11660887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Privacy and the right to die.
    Riga PJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1981; 26(2):89-126. PubMed ID: 11651685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.