BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9779395)

  • 1. Trunk kinematics and trunk muscle activity during a rapidly applied load.
    Thomas JS; Lavender SA; Corcos DM; Andersson GB
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1998 Aug; 8(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 9779395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of lifting belts on trunk muscle activation during a suddenly applied load.
    Thomas JS; Lavender SA; Corcos DM; Andersson GB
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 10774136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The in vivo dynamic response of the human spine to rapid lateral bend perturbation: effects of preload and step input magnitude.
    Chiang J; Potvin JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(13):1457-64. PubMed ID: 11458151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The in vivo dynamic response of the spine to perturbations causing rapid flexion: effects of pre-load and step input magnitude.
    Krajcarski SR; Potvin JR; Chiang J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Jan; 14(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 10619090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbopelvic landing kinematics and EMG in women with contrasting hip strength.
    Popovich JM; Kulig K
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 21659899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activity of Erector Spinae During Trunk Forward Bending and Backward Return: The Effects of Age.
    Shojaei I; Bazrgari B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1511-1519. PubMed ID: 28194659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decrease in trunk muscular response to perturbation with preactivation of lumbar spinal musculature.
    Stokes IA; Gardner-Morse M; Henry SM; Badger GJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1957-64. PubMed ID: 10908940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of sudden walking perturbations on neuromuscular reflex activity and three-dimensional motion of the trunk in healthy controls and back pain symptomatic subjects.
    Mueller J; Engel T; Mueller S; Stoll J; Baur H; Mayer F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174034. PubMed ID: 28319133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon relative to the lumbar motion to load and speed.
    Sarti MA; Lisón JF; Monfort M; Fuster MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(18):E421-6. PubMed ID: 11547213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture.
    Cholewicki J; Panjabi MM; Khachatryan A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(19):2207-12. PubMed ID: 9346140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of changes in orientation and position of external loads on trunk muscle activity and kinematics in upright standing.
    El Ouaaid Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2014 Jun; 24(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 24650795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passive repetitive loading of the lumbar tissues influences force output and EMG during maximal efforts.
    Olson MW
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2011 Jul; 111(7):1269-78. PubMed ID: 21132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading.
    Lavender SA; Shakeel K; Andersson GB; Thomas JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1569-78. PubMed ID: 10851108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trunk muscle response to lifting unbalanced loads with and without knowledge of centre of mass.
    Meyers BM; Keir PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Oct; 18(8):712-20. PubMed ID: 12957557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Torso loading via a harness method activates trunk muscles less than a hand loading method.
    McMulkin ML; Woldstad JC; Hughes RE
    J Biomech; 1998 Apr; 31(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 9672095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of backpack load on critical changes of trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine loading during walking.
    Li SSW; Chow DHK
    Ergonomics; 2018 Apr; 61(4):553-565. PubMed ID: 28791922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muscle activity and low back loads under external shear and compressive loading.
    Callaghan JP; McGill SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(9):992-8. PubMed ID: 7631247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between the effectiveness of expiration and abdominal bracing maneuvers in maintaining spinal stability following sudden trunk loading.
    Ishida H; Suehiro T; Kurozumi C; Watanabe S
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Feb; 26():125-9. PubMed ID: 26711271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.