These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9779674)

  • 1. Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument--the BICRO-39 scales. Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome.
    Powell JH; Beckers K; Greenwood RJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Oct; 79(10):1213-25. PubMed ID: 9779674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program.
    Donaghy S; Wass PJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Oct; 79(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 9779676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: an assessment of factor structure and validity.
    Sander AM; Fuchs KL; High WM; Hall KM; Kreutzer JS; Rosenthal M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Oct; 80(10):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10527092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective assessment of rehabilitation outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and utility of the functional independence level.
    Schatz P; Hillary FG; Moelter ST; Chute DL
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2002 Dec; 17(6):510-25. PubMed ID: 12802242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers.
    Whiteneck GG; Harrison-Felix CL; Mellick DC; Brooks CA; Charlifue SB; Gerhart KA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 85(8):1324-35. PubMed ID: 15295760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.
    Whyte J; Hart T; Ellis CA; Chervoneva I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):966-73. PubMed ID: 18452747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury: psychometric properties of a new scale.
    Tate R; Hodgkinson A; Veerabangsa A; Maggiotto S
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 1999 Dec; 14(6):543-57. PubMed ID: 10671700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rehabilitation results of persons with severe traumatic brain injury].
    Dénes Z
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Nov; 146(47):2403-6. PubMed ID: 16398153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the Key Behaviors Change Inventory: a traumatic brain injury behavioral outcome assessment instrument.
    Kolitz BP; Vanderploeg RD; Curtiss G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 84(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 12601661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concordance of patients' and family members' ratings of neurobehavioral functioning after traumatic brain injury.
    Seel RT; Kreutzer JS; Sander AM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 78(11):1254-9. PubMed ID: 9365357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in community-based brain injury rehabilitation.
    Jenkinson N; Ownsworth T; Shum D
    Brain Inj; 2007 Nov; 21(12):1283-94. PubMed ID: 18236203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of the BIRT Independent Living Scale.
    Ramos SDS; Oddy M; Haye L; Goodson A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 40(23):2817-2823. PubMed ID: 28805087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agreement between persons with traumatic brain injury and their relatives regarding psychosocial outcome using the Community Integration Questionnaire.
    Sander AM; Seel RT; Kreutzer JS; Hall KM; High WM; Rosenthal M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 78(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 9111453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial.
    Powell J; Heslin J; Greenwood R
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Feb; 72(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 11796769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and responsiveness of the care and needs scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury.
    Soo C; Tate RL; Aird V; Allaous J; Browne S; Carr B; Coulston C; Diffley L; Gurka J; Hummell J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 20510982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Community integration 2 years after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.
    Sandhaug M; Andelic N; Langhammer B; Mygland A
    Brain Inj; 2015; 29(7-8):915-20. PubMed ID: 25962927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ecologically relevant outcome measure for post-inpatient rehabilitation.
    Marquez de la Plata C; Qualls D; Plenger P; Malec JF; Hayden ME
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 40(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 28222542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation.
    McColl MA; Davies D; Carlson P; Johnston J; Minnes P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Apr; 82(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 11295000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Kreutzer JS; Marwitz JH; Seel R; Serio CD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Feb; 77(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 8607734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure.
    Litwin MS; Hays RD; Fink A; Ganz PA; Leake B; Brook RH
    Med Care; 1998 Jul; 36(7):1002-12. PubMed ID: 9674618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.