These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9780)

  • 1. Influence of the cation on the side-effects of urographic contrast media.
    Dahl SG; Linaker O; Mellbye A; Sveen K
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1976 Jul; 17(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 9780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of three contrast agents used in cerebral angiography.
    Bentson JR; Wilson GH
    Invest Radiol; 1976; 11(6):602-4. PubMed ID: 794022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast media with and without calcium for cardioangiography in children.
    Tay DJ; Levin AR; Schubert E; Baltaxe HA
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1976 Jul; 17(4):449-60. PubMed ID: 9779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-blind comparison of iodamide and diatrizoate for excretory urography.
    Rosenfield AT; Putman CE; Ulreich S; Koss N
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977; 50(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 345632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iohexol and metrizoate in urography of insulin dependent patients.
    Edgren J; Laasonen L; Groop PH; Groop L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(3):265-7. PubMed ID: 3751672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pulmonary edema following high intravenous doses of ionic contrast media. Effect of the anion composition and concentration.
    Mare K; Violante M; Fischer HW
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 6469523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iohexol compared with metrizoate in urography.
    Levorstad K; Kolbenstvedt A; Løyning EW
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1983; 24(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 6637574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double-blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 for excretory urography.
    Gerzof SG; Robbins AH; Unger G; Zaki A; Wickis EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Feb; 128(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 401604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cerebral angiography with non-ionic (metrizamide) and ionic (meglumine metrizoate) watersoluble contrast media. A comparative study with double blind technic.
    Skalpe IO; Lundervold A; Tjorstad K
    Neuroradiology; 1977 Aug; 14(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 331137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the excretion of sodium and meglumine diatrizoate at urography with simulated compression: an experimental study in the rat.
    Owman T
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1981 Jul; 49(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7336961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thrombosis following phlebography with ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Albrechtsson U; Olsson CG
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1979; 20(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography.
    Adamali N; Raja R
    East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral).
    Skalpe IO; Anke IM
    Neuroradiology; 1983; 25(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 6350922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thrombosis after phlebography: a comparison of two contrast media.
    Albrechtsson U; Olsson CG
    Cardiovasc Radiol; 1979; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 526976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of side effects during cerebral computed tomography with a nonionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
    Skalpe IO; Hordvik M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):326-8. PubMed ID: 6410735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications in cerebral angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque cerebral).
    Skalpe IO
    Neuroradiology; 1988; 30(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3282185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.