These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9780524)

  • 1. Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: the role of resistance as a predictor variable.
    Groth-Marnat G; Mitchell K
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9780524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct and indirect scales of hypnotic susceptibility: resistance to therapy and psychometric comparability.
    Robin BR; Kumar VK; Pekala RJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Apr; 53(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 16025732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques.
    Szabó C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between memory, suggestibility and hypnotic responsivity.
    Eisen ML
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Oct; 39(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 8936713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review.
    Lynn SJ; Neufeld V; Maré C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):124-52. PubMed ID: 8468104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Kirsch I; Council JR; Wickless C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 2347668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of hypnotic processes and responsiveness in a clinical context.
    Spinhoven P; Vanderlinden J; ter Kuile MM; Linseen AC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):210-24. PubMed ID: 8335420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Dixon M; Labelle L; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jul; 44(3):250-64. PubMed ID: 8690536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring hypnotizability: the case for self-report depth scales and normative data for the long Stanford scale.
    Wagstaff GF; Cole JC; Brunas-Wagstaff J
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Apr; 56(2):119-42. PubMed ID: 18307124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is hypnotic suggestibility a stable trait?
    Fassler O; Lynn SJ; Knox J
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):240-53. PubMed ID: 17576075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary process, hypnotic dreams, and the hidden observer: hypnosis versus alert imagining.
    Pinnell CM; Lynn SJ; Pinnell JP
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 9780526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure?
    Kirsch I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 9204635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of direct versus indirect hypnotic suggestion on pain in a cold pressor task.
    Maurer C; Santangelo M; Claiborn CD
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Oct; 41(4):305-16. PubMed ID: 8407019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypnotizability, sleepiness, and subjective experience.
    Móró L; Noreika V; Revonsuo A; Kallio S
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Apr; 59(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21390980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hypnotic responsiveness: expectancy, attitudes, fantasy proneness, absorption, and gender.
    Green JP; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2011 Jan; 59(1):103-21. PubMed ID: 21104487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hypnosis, suggestion type, and subjective experience--the order-effects hypothesis revisited: a brief communication.
    Weekes JR; Lynn SJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 2347670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive utility of hypnotizability: the change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis.
    Milling LS; Coursen EL; Shores JS; Waszkiewicz JA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2010 Feb; 78(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20099958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hypnotic responsivity of the deaf: the development of the University of Tennessee Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale for the Deaf.
    Repka RJ; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jul; 43(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 7635582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Personality correlates of hypnotizability: a study using the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, the 16-PF and the IPAT.
    Rhoades CD; Edmonston WE
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1969 Apr; 11(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 5767561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses.
    Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.