441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9780527)
41. [Adaptation to Spanish of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire-Revised Version (VVIQRV)].
Beato MS; Díez E; Pinho MS; Rodrigues Simões M
Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):711-6. PubMed ID: 17296107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Psychometric quality of a revised version Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
Campos A; Pérez-Fabello MJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):798-802. PubMed ID: 19725316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hypnotizability, the dissociative experiences scale, HGSHS: A amnesia, and automatic writing: is there an association?
Green JP
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jan; 45(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 8991297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The predictive utility of hypnotizability: the change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis.
Milling LS; Coursen EL; Shores JS; Waszkiewicz JA
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2010 Feb; 78(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20099958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Measuring hypnotizability: the case for self-report depth scales and normative data for the long Stanford scale.
Wagstaff GF; Cole JC; Brunas-Wagstaff J
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Apr; 56(2):119-42. PubMed ID: 18307124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Recurrence quantification analysis of electroencephalograph signals during standard tasks of Waterloo-Stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
Yargholi E; Nasrabadi AM
J Med Eng Technol; 2015 Jan; 39(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25367766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hypnotic responsivity of the deaf: the development of the University of Tennessee Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale for the Deaf.
Repka RJ; Nash MR
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jul; 43(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 7635582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Seating preference, hypnotizability, and imagery ability.
Cranney J; McConkey KM
Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Jun; 50(3 Pt 2):1175-8. PubMed ID: 7413391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An inquiry into the construct validity of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
Chara PJ; Hamm DA
Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Aug; 69(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 2780173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Hypnotizability and opinions about hypnosis in a clinical trial for the hypnotic control of pain and anxiety during pregnancy termination.
Dufresne A; Rainville P; Dodin S; Barré P; Masse B; Verreault R; Marc I
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2010 Jan; 58(1):82-101. PubMed ID: 20183740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Hypnotizability-related EEG alpha and theta activities during visual and somesthetic imageries.
Cavallaro FI; Cacace I; Del Testa M; Andre P; Carli G; De Pascalis V; Rocchi R; Santarcangelo EL
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Feb; 470(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 20035834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Hypnotizability and performance at examination. A correlative study.
Palan BM; Chandwani S
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1986; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 3818040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Does the more vivid imagery of high hypnotizables depend on greater cognitive effort? A test of dissociation and social-cognitive theories of hypnosis.
Sadler P; Woody EZ
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2006 Oct; 54(4):372-91. PubMed ID: 16950682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hypnotizability and blink rate: a test of the dopamine hypothesis.
Lichtenberg P; Even-Or E; Bachner-Melman R; Levin R; Brin A; Heresco-Levy U
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Jul; 56(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 18569136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Psychological modulation of auditory responses.
Hall H; Minnes L
Int J Psychosom; 1989; 36(1-4):59-63. PubMed ID: 2599787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Motor imagery during hypnotic arm paralysis in high and low hypnotizable subjects.
Roelofs K; Hoogduin KA; Keijsers GP
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2002 Jan; 50(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 11783441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Individual differences in afterimage persistence: relationships to hypnotic susceptibility and visuospatial skills.
Atkinson RP; Crawford HJ
Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(4):527-39. PubMed ID: 1481949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons.
Crawford HJ; Brown AM; Moon CE
J Abnorm Psychol; 1993 Nov; 102(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 8282921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.
Andrade J; May J; Deeprose C; Baugh SJ; Ganis G
Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):547-63. PubMed ID: 24117327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Relationship between two different types of imagery vividness questionnaire items and three Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale factors: a brief communication.
Farthing GW; Venturino M; Brown SW
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1983 Jan; 31(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 6822447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
