These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9780888)

  • 1. A directed shrinkage approach to the provision of foundations for decimated teeth.
    Nasedkin JN
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 Jul; 19(7):671-4, 676, 678 passim; quiz 684. PubMed ID: 9780888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system.
    Estafan D; Agosta C
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 15055646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Split increment horizontal layering: a simplified placement technique for direct posterior resin restorations.
    Hassan K; Khier S
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):406-9. PubMed ID: 16366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Davidson-Kaban SS
    Dent Update; 1998 Sep; 25(7):274-9. PubMed ID: 10478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of core material on fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of restored root filled teeth.
    Reill MI; Rosentritt M; Naumann M; Handel G
    Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 18355251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.