132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9781476)
1. Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs.
Hicks C; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Akridge JT; Wagner JR; Chen W
J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2221-34. PubMed ID: 9781476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ractopamine treatment biases in the prediction of pork carcass composition.
Schinckel AP; Herr CT; Richert BT; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 12597368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses.
Johnson RK; Berg EP; Goodwin R; Mabry JW; Miller RK; Robison OW; Sellers H; Tokach MD
J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2428-41. PubMed ID: 15318744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of alternative measures of pork carcass composition.
Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
J Anim Sci; 2001 May; 79(5):1093-119. PubMed ID: 11374529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of transverse and longitudinal real-time ultrasound scans for prediction of lean cut yields and fat-free lean content in live pigs.
Cisneros F; Ellis M; Miller KD; Novakofski J; Wilson ER; McKeith FK
J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2566-76. PubMed ID: 8923171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of live and carcass characteristics of market hogs by use of a single longitudinal ultrasonic scan.
Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Riemann MJ; Wyatt RW; Henderson HH
J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1409-16. PubMed ID: 8071163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phenotypic measurements and various indices of lean and fat tissue development in barrows and gilts of two genetic lines from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight.
Wiseman TG; Mahan DC; Moeller SJ; Peters JC; Fastinger ND; Ching S; Kim YY
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1816-24. PubMed ID: 17400970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Growth, development, and carcass composition in five genotypes of swine.
Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1719-29. PubMed ID: 1634396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the prediction of alternative measures of pork carcass composition by three optical probes.
Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):767-94. PubMed ID: 19820040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the accuracy of real-time ultrasonic measurements of backfat and loin muscle area in swine using multiple statistical analysis procedures.
Moeller SJ; Christian LL
J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2503-14. PubMed ID: 9814887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of swine carcass composition by total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC).
Higbie AD; Bidner TD; Matthews JO; Southern LL; Page TG; Persica MA; Sanders MB; Monlezun CJ
J Anim Sci; 2002 Jan; 80(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 11831507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of alternative techniques to determine pork carcass value.
Akridge JT; Brorsen BW; Whipker LD; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Schinckel AP
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 1582906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotype and treatment biases in estimation of carcass lean of swine.
Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Martin TG; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Watkins LE
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1708-18. PubMed ID: 1634395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An embryo transfer study of reciprocal cross differences in growth and carcass traits of Duroc and Landrace pigs.
Wilken TM; Lo LL; McLaren DG; Fernando RL; Dziuk PJ
J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2349-58. PubMed ID: 1506298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: II. Statistical analysis of error attributable to sex, genotype, and weight.
Boland MA; Foster KA; Schinckel AP; Chen W; Wagner J; Berg EP; Forrest JC
J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):645-50. PubMed ID: 7607996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative trait locus mapping in an F2 Duroc x Pietrain resource population: II. Carcass and meat quality traits.
Edwards DB; Ernst CW; Raney NE; Doumit ME; Hoge MD; Bates RO
J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):254-66. PubMed ID: 17965326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics, commercial cutting and curing yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts from two genotypes.
Cisneros F; Ellis M; McKeith FK; McCaw J; Fernando RL
J Anim Sci; 1996 May; 74(5):925-33. PubMed ID: 8726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the impact of errors in the measurement of backfat depth on the prediction of fat-free lean mass.
Schinckel AP; Einstein ME; Foster K; Craig BA
J Anim Sci; 2007 Aug; 85(8):2031-42. PubMed ID: 17431039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
