203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9781870)
1. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Martinez LJ; von Fraunhofer JA
J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9743664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.
Boulton JL; Gage JP; Vincent PF; Basford KE
Aust Dent J; 1996 Dec; 41(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 9008997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
Fenske C
Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative putty/wash impression technique.
Bassi GS
Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):376-8. PubMed ID: 11218529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
Sulong MZ; Setchell DJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
