These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9782142)

  • 1. Staple pull-out strength in an animal model of Cooper's ligament.
    Paraiso MF; Cummings JF; Walters MD
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 Nov; 5(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 9782142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The tensile strength of Cooper's ligament suturing: comparison of abdominal and transvaginal techniques.
    Goldberg RP; Koduri S; Sand PK; Kwon C; Culligan P
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(6):425-7; discussion 428. PubMed ID: 15278253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security.
    Lo IK; Burkhart SS; Chan KC; Athanasiou K
    Arthroscopy; 2004 May; 20(5):489-502. PubMed ID: 15122139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
    Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
    Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The tensile strength of uterosacral ligament sutures: a comparison of vaginal and laparoscopic techniques.
    Culligan PJ; Miklos JR; Murphy M; Goldberg R; Graham C; Moore RD; Hainer M; Heit MH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):500-3. PubMed ID: 12636953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative physical and handling characteristics of novel antibacterial braided silk suture materials.
    Chen X; Hou D; Tang X; Wang L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():160-70. PubMed ID: 26143308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of anchors used in anti-incontinence surgery.
    Klutke JJ; Bullock A; Klutke CG
    Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):979-81. PubMed ID: 9836540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ligament-tendon fixation: analysis of a new stitch and comparison with standard techniques.
    Krackow KA; Thomas SC; Jones LC
    Orthopedics; 1988 Jun; 11(6):909-17. PubMed ID: 3290873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Anatomical study of Cooper's ligament. Value in the surgical cure of urinary incontinence in women].
    Perdu M; Darai E; Goffinet F; Madelenat P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Jan; 27(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 9583045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strength and knot security of braided polyester and caprolactone/glycolide suture.
    Bibbo C; Milia MJ; Gehrmann RM; Patel DV; Anderson RB
    Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Oct; 25(10):712-5. PubMed ID: 15566702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial pull-out strength of tendon sutures: an in vitro study in sheep Achilles tendon.
    Yildirim Y; Esemenli T
    Foot Ankle Int; 2002 Dec; 23(12):1126-30. PubMed ID: 12503805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the strength of knots tied by hand and at laparoscopy.
    Kadirkamanathan SS; Shelton JC; Hepworth CC; Laufer JG; Swain CP
    J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jan; 182(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 8542089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff stitches.
    Ma CB; MacGillivray JD; Clabeaux J; Lee S; Otis JC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1211-6. PubMed ID: 15173294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique.
    Gan AW; Neo PY; He M; Yam AK; Chong AK; Tay SC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1830-4. PubMed ID: 22857910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of strength of sacrocolpopexy mesh attachment using barbed and nonbarbed sutures.
    Pilkinton ML; Levine GC; Bennett L; Winkler HA; Shalom DF; Finamore PS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):153-159. PubMed ID: 28980021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.
    Abiri A; Paydar O; Tao A; LaRocca M; Liu K; Genovese B; Candler R; Grundfest WS; Dutson EP
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3258-3270. PubMed ID: 27928670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Coons DA; Boothby MH
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1063.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17027403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of staples vs suturing for securing central venous catheters.
    Hightower D; March J; Ausband S; Brown LH
    Acad Emerg Med; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1103-5. PubMed ID: 8959163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of the pull-out strength of 6 suture loop configurations in flexor tendons.
    Karjalainen T; He M; Chong AK; Lim AY; Ryhanen J
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 37(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 22281167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.