These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9782872)

  • 21. Using comparison charts to assess performance measurement data.
    Lee KY; McGreevey C
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2002 Mar; 28(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 11902028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptions and misconceptions regarding the Joint Commission's view of quality monitoring.
    Patterson CH
    Am J Infect Control; 1989 Oct; 17(5):231-40. PubMed ID: 2817511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Joint Commission perspective: using standards and indicators to monitor performance.
    Patterson CH
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1989; 7(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 10291872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Joint Commission releases Improving America's Hospitals: The Joint Commission's Annual Report on Quality and Safety, 2008.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jan; 29(1):3, 5. PubMed ID: 19368073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evolution of Joint Commission ORYX initiative.
    Weber D
    QRC Advis; 1999 Jul; 15(9):9-12. PubMed ID: 10538790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ready to answer ORYX data questions? Here's what Joint Commission will ask.
    ED Manag; 2000 Apr; 12(4):37-42. PubMed ID: 11067330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stay current with staffing effectiveness standards.
    Mooney MC
    Nurs Manage; 2004 Feb; 35(2):14. PubMed ID: 14767226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Joint Commission's ORYX may have data flaws.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 Jul; 5(7):102-3. PubMed ID: 10184940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accreditation requirements for ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
    Zeglen M
    J AHIMA; 1997 Jun; 68(6):20-2, 24-31. PubMed ID: 10167799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ORYX enters the accreditation race.
    Mahady M
    Manag Care Interface; 1998 Dec; 11(12):68-72, 100. PubMed ID: 10338745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The evolution of the Joint Commission's nursing standards.
    Wakefield B
    J Healthc Qual; 1994; 16(3):15-21; quiz 21, 48. PubMed ID: 10133826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Keeping an eye on the Joint Commission's new core measures.
    Dougherty M
    J AHIMA; 2000 May; 71(5):59-60. PubMed ID: 11009877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring and improving the performance of health care providers: accreditation in the 21st century.
    Nadzam DM; Loeb JM
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Apr; 26(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 9584806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reviewing the data: what ORYX means to you.
    Homa-Lowry J
    Hosp Case Manag; 1998 Oct; 6(10):195-6, 201-2, 207. PubMed ID: 10185917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Data-driven performance improvement in health care: the Joint Commission's Indicator Measurement System (IMSystem).
    Nadzam DM; Turpin R; Hanold LS; White RE
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1993 Nov; 19(11):492-500. PubMed ID: 8313012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ORYX requirements simplified.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1999; 19(3):4. PubMed ID: 10538768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
    Bender N
    Ambul Outreach; 1998; ():23-4. PubMed ID: 10346585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Approved: New hospital standard sets performance expectations for ORYX accountability measures.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2011 Aug; 31(8):3, 5. PubMed ID: 22315795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary: inaccurate data on the quality of care may do more harm than good--an alternative approach is required.
    Boscarino JA; Chang J
    Am J Med Qual; 1997; 12(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 9385731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.