266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9784317)
21. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Endocervical curretage: an analysis of results in 1997 women].
Li N; Zhang WH; Wu LY; Li AL; Qiao YL; Li L; Pan QJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2004 Jul; 26(7):406-8. PubMed ID: 15355644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of endocervical curettage with conization in diagnosis of endocervical lesions.
Suzuki Y; Cho T; Mogami T; Yokota NR; Matsunaga T; Asai-Sato M; Hirahara F; Nojima M; Mori M; Miyagi E
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):723-728. PubMed ID: 28168772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of Endocervical Curettage in the Diagnosis of High-grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer in Selected Patients.
Akladios C; Lecointre L; Baulon E; Thoma V; Averous G; Fender M; Lefebvre F; Baldauf JJ
Anticancer Res; 2015 Jul; 35(7):4183-9. PubMed ID: 26124376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Necessity for endocervical curettage in elderly women undergoing colposcopy.
Dinh TA; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Dillard EA
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):621-4. PubMed ID: 2810244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities.
Solomon D; Stoler M; Jeronimo J; Khan M; Castle P; Schiffman M
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):288-95. PubMed ID: 17666602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Endocervical curettage. Its use in the colposcopic assessment of a patient who has an abnormal cervico-vaginal smear].
Bergeron C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(8):989-94. PubMed ID: 2081876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage during colposcopy.
Dreyfus M; Baldauf JJ; Ritter J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Jan; 64(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 8801132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Positive endocervical curettage in patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory colposcopy: clinical implications.
Krebs HB; Wheelock JB; Hurt WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 3822303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia].
Yang SL; Kong WM; Wu YM; Duan W; Zhu L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 48(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 24016476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade].
Starzewski J; Góźdź S; Chil A; Piasek G; Plutecki J; Smorag L; Dembowska R; Krawczyk J
Wiad Lek; 2003; 56(3-4):162-6. PubMed ID: 12923964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?
Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictive value of endocervical curettage at cervical conization and provider practices in management of high-grade cervical dysplasia.
Barlin JN; Bristow RE; Murillo AM; Zahurak M; Veras E; Salani R
J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):129-33. PubMed ID: 20506673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
