267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9784317)
41. Evaluation of endocervical canal in women with minimal cervical cytological abnormalities.
Goksedef BP; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Corbacioglu A; Guraslan H; Bakir LV; Kaya O; Yanik G; Cetin A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Jul; 17(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 23422642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Value of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after conization in the prediction of residual disease in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Lin CT; Tseng CJ; Lai CH; Hsueh S; Huang KG; Huang HJ; Chao A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):940-5. PubMed ID: 11303202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Positive results of endocervical curettage as an indication for conization of the cervix.
Glazer JD; Benrubi GI; Nuss RC
South Med J; 1987 Feb; 80(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 3810213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy.
Zhang X; Dou Y; Wang M; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():53-58. PubMed ID: 28850822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Increasing the sensitivity of endocervical curettings by performing ThinPrep® Pap on transport container fluid: is diagnostic material going down the drain?
Lastra RR; Meykler SE; Baloch ZW; Barroeta JE
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 25123326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Risk of residual invasive disease in women with microinvasive squamous cancer in a conization specimen.
Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Agahjanian A; Qian D; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 9351760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Correlating cone biopsy histology with operative indications.
Massad LS; Chronopoulos FT; Cejtin HE
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 May; 65(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 9159339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Necessity of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Moseley KR; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Dillard EA; Yandell RB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):992-5. PubMed ID: 3706454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cytology and curetting diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Bruehl FK; Dyhdalo KS; Hou Y; Clapacs E; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):556-562. PubMed ID: 32624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse.
Pretorius RG; Zhang WH; Belinson JL; Huang MN; Wu LY; Zhang X; Qiao YL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 15343217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Diagnostic value of multiply biopsies and endocervical curettage on cervical lesions].
Zhang L; Du H; Zhang W; Yang B; Wang C; Belinson JL; Wu R
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 50(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 26080937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Can adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix be predicted before cervical conization?
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Prompittayarat W; Kanjanavaha P; Peuwsai R; Dheerakul C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(4):522-4. PubMed ID: 17250421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An analysis of the factors involved in the colposcopic evaluation of 2194 patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smears.
Wetrich DW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 154(6):1339-49. PubMed ID: 3717244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The role of endocervical curettage in satisfactory colposcopy.
el-Dabh A; Rogers RE; Davis TE; Sutton GP
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2748050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
