BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9784430)

  • 1. The prevalence of chromium allergy in the United States and its implications for setting soil cleanup: a cost-effectiveness case study.
    Proctor DM; Fredrick MM; Scott PK; Paustenbach DJ; Finley BL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9784430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of the allergic contact dermatitis hazard posed by chromium-contaminated soil: identifying a "safe" concentration.
    Paustenbach DJ; Sheehan PJ; Paull JM; Wisser LM; Finley BL
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1992 Sep; 37(1):177-207. PubMed ID: 1522610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk assessment of the allergic dermatitis potential of environmental exposure to hexavalent chromium.
    Stern AH; Bagdon RE; Hazen RE; Marzulli FN
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 Dec; 40(4):613-41. PubMed ID: 8277522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using human sweat to extract chromium from chromite ore processing residue: applications to setting health-based cleanup levels.
    Horowitz SB; Finley BL
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 Dec; 40(4):585-99. PubMed ID: 8277520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cr(III) reactivity and foot dermatitis in Cr(VI) positive patients.
    Hansen MB; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 16524436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of chromium induced allergic contact dermatitis with 54 volunteers: implications for environmental risk assessment.
    Nethercott J; Paustenbach D; Adams R; Fowler J; Marks J; Morton C; Taylor J; Horowitz S; Finley B
    Occup Environ Med; 1994 Jun; 51(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 8044228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dermatological toxicity of hexavalent chromium.
    Shelnutt SR; Goad P; Belsito DV
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 37(5):375-87. PubMed ID: 17612952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the human health risks posed by exposure to chromium-contaminated soils.
    Sheehan PJ; Meyer DM; Sauer MM; Paustenbach DJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1991 Feb; 32(2):161-201. PubMed ID: 1995927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting health-protective soil concentrations for dermal contact allergens: a proposed methodology.
    Horowitz SB; Finley BL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 8159813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
    Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence rates of occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by metals.
    Kanerva L; Jolanki R; Estlander T; Alanko K; Savela A
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 11012003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A retrospective investigation of hexavalent chromium allergy in southern Sweden.
    Lejding T; Mowitz M; Isaksson M; Bruze M; Pontén A; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Jun; 78(6):386-392. PubMed ID: 29572843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium. Final rule.
    Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Department of Labor
    Fed Regist; 2006 Feb; 71(39):10099-385. PubMed ID: 16528853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils: options for risk assessment and risk management.
    Felter SP; Dourson ML
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Feb; 25(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 9056500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin application of glutathione and iron sulfate can inhibit elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis from hexavalent chromium.
    Lejding T; Engfeldt M; Bruze M; Isaksson M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Verma K; Mowitz M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Jan; 82(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 31584201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No immediate effect of regulatory reduction of chromium in leather among adult patients with chromium allergy.
    Alinaghi F; Thyssen JP; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Nov; 85(5):514-522. PubMed ID: 34185877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuing exposure to hexavalent chromium, a known lung carcinogen: an analysis of OSHA compliance inspections, 1990-2000.
    Lurie P; Wolfe SM
    Am J Ind Med; 2002 Nov; 42(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 12382250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional variation in prevalence and etiology of allergic contact dermatitis.
    Thompson TR; Belsito DV
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Dec; 13(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 12478532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative aspects of contact allergy to chromium and exposure to chrome-tanned leather.
    Hansen MB; Rydin S; Menné T; Duus Johansen J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Sep; 47(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 12492543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable risk of contact allergy in the general population assessed by CE-DUR--a method to detect and categorize contact allergy epidemics based on patient data.
    Thyssen JP; Menné T; Schnuch A; Uter W; White I; White JM; Johansen JD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19383524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.