These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9784952)

  • 1. Accuracy of registration methods in frameless stereotaxis.
    Helm PA; Eckel TS
    Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 9784952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application accuracy study of a semipermanent fiducial system for frameless stereotaxis.
    Vinas FC; Zamorano L; Buciuc R; Li QH; Shamsa F; Jiang Z; Diaz FG
    Comput Aided Surg; 1997; 2(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 9484586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.
    Fitzpatrick JM; West JB; Maurer CR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Oct; 17(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 9874293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactive image directed neurosurgery: patient registration employing the Laitinen stereo-adapter.
    Hirschberg H; Kirkeby OJ
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 1996 Dec; 39(4):105-7. PubMed ID: 9007827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contour and paired-point registration in a model for image-guided surgery.
    Knott PD; Batra PS; Butler RS; Citardi MJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1877-81. PubMed ID: 17003709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of computer-aided surgery registration methods for endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Hardy SM; Melroy C; White DR; Dubin M; Senior B
    Am J Rhinol; 2006; 20(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 16539295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of internal fiducial markers in frameless stereotactic navigational systems during spinal surgery: technical note.
    Salehi SA; Ondra SL
    Neurosurgery; 2000 Dec; 47(6):1460-2. PubMed ID: 11126921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Online head motion tracking applied to the patient registration problem.
    Westermann B; Hauser R
    Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 10964086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic correction of registration errors in surgical navigation systems.
    Wittmann W; Wenger T; Zaminer B; Lueth TC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2922-30. PubMed ID: 21803677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of multimodality registration in frameless stereotaxy.
    Villalobos H; Germano IM
    Comput Aided Surg; 1999; 4(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10417830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of object-induced MR distortion correction for frameless stereotactic neurosurgery.
    Dean D; Kamath J; Duerk JL; Ganz E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Oct; 17(5):810-6. PubMed ID: 9874306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application accuracy of automatic registration in frameless stereotaxy.
    Rachinger J; von Keller B; Ganslandt O; Fahlbusch R; Nimsky C
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2006; 84(2-3):109-17. PubMed ID: 16840821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.
    Papadopoulos EC; Girardi FP; Sama A; Sandhu HS; Cammisa FP
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):263-7; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 15863081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy, efficacy, and clinical applications of the Radionics Operating Arm System.
    Eljamel MS
    Comput Aided Surg; 1997; 2(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 9484590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Template-based registration for image-guided maxillofacial surgery.
    Eggers G; Mühling J; Marmulla R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1330-6. PubMed ID: 16122598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fiducial versus nonfiducial neuronavigation registration assessment and considerations of accuracy.
    Pfisterer WK; Papadopoulos S; Drumm DA; Smith K; Preul MC
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Mar; 62(3 Suppl 1):201-7; discussion 207-8. PubMed ID: 18424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive registration methods for image-guided oral implant surgery.
    Widmann G; Stoffner R; Schullian P; Widmann R; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Puelacher W; Bale RJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 20556247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated rejection of contaminated surface measurements for improved surface registration in image guided neurosurgery.
    Bucholz R; Macneil W; Fewings P; Ravindra A; McDurmont L; Baumann C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():39-45. PubMed ID: 10977579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving target registration accuracy in image-guided neurosurgery by optimizing the distribution of fiducial points.
    Wang M; Song Z
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19107838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy and reliability of 3D CT/MRI co-registration in planning epilepsy surgery.
    Tao JX; Hawes-Ebersole S; Baldwin M; Shah S; Erickson RK; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19264546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.