These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9784992)

  • 41. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
    Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Differences between false-negative and true-positive Papanicolaou smears on Papnet-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Aug; 19(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 9702494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. New paradigm for ASCUS diagnosis using neural networks.
    Kok MR; Habers MA; Schreiner-Kok PG; Boon ME
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Nov; 19(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 9812231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system.
    Abulafia O; Sherer DM
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Apr; 54(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 10198930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
    Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
    Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The PAPNET system in cytological rescreening of cervical smears].
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Apr; 49(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 9206764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. PAPNET. The human and other dimensions.
    Husain OA; Kocjan G; Butler EB; McGloin JE
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(5):1439-44. PubMed ID: 9305381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Efficacy of automated cervical cytology screening.
    Slagel DD; Zaleski S; Cohen MB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 7587871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
    Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
    Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Computer-assisted rescreening of cervicovaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou method. Evaluation of the PAPNET system apropos of 225 cases].
    Vuong PN; Vacher-Lavenu MC; Marsan C; Baviera E
    Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 7574913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection.
    Ronnett BM; Manos MM; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Ngai JS; Kurman RJ; Sherman ME
    Hum Pathol; 1999 Jul; 30(7):816-25. PubMed ID: 10414501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
    Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
    Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of AutoPap system location-guided screening in the evaluation of cervical cytology smears.
    Stevens MW; Milne AJ; Parkinson IH; Nespolon WW; Fazzalari NL; Arora N; Dodd TJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Aug; 31(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 15282720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system.
    Marshall CJ; Rowe L; Bentz JS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.