268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9785158)
1. Use of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurse practitioners.
Mann CJ; Grant I; Guly H; Hughes P
J Accid Emerg Med; 1998 Sep; 15(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 9785158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative analysis of ENP's and SHO's in the application of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Hopkins M
Int Emerg Nurs; 2010 Oct; 18(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 20869659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse practitioners and the Ottawa Ankle Rules: comparisons with medical staff in requesting X-rays for ankle injured patients.
Allerston J; Justham D
Accid Emerg Nurs; 2000 Apr; 8(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 10818378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses working in an accident and emergency department.
Salt P; Clancy M
J Accid Emerg Med; 1997 Nov; 14(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 9413774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.
Perry S; Raby N; Grant PT
J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Jul; 16(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10417931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital.
Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P
Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department.
Lau LH; Kerr D; Law I; Ritchie P
Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 16(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 23953094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Auleley GR; Ravaud P; Giraudeau B; Kerboull L; Nizard R; Massin P; Garreau de Loubresse C; Vallée C; Durieux P
JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(24):1935-9. PubMed ID: 9200633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.
Papacostas E; Malliaropoulos N; Papadopoulos A; Liouliakis C
Br J Sports Med; 2001 Dec; 35(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 11726486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: A systematic review.
Ho JK; Chau JP; Cheung NM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Nov; 63():37-47. PubMed ID: 27592083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
Libetta C; Burke D; Brennan P; Yassa J
J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 16(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 10505914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]