123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9787398)
1. Three-dimensional imaging and osteometry of adult human skulls using helical computed tomography.
Nagashima M; Inoue K; Sasaki T; Miyasaka K; Matsumura G; Kodama G
Surg Radiol Anat; 1998; 20(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 9787398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Craniometric study of Thai skull based on three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) data.
Rooppakhun S; Surasith P; Vatanapatimakul N; Kaewprom Y; Sitthiseripratip K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jan; 93(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 20196417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.
Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F
Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of CT scanograms and cephalometric radiographs in craniofacial imaging.
Chidiac JJ; Shofer FS; Al-Kutoub A; Laster LL; Ghafari J
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 May; 5(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 12086325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the CT scanogram for assessment of craniofacial morphology.
Lee FC; Noar JH; Evans RD
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20936950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of the anthropometric measurements of skeletonized skulls with corresponding measurements of their 3D reconstructions obtained by CT scanning.
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Kociemba W; Sroka A; Kulczyk T; Żaba C; Paprzycki W; Przystańska A
Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 26131560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Knapp RH
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1990 Jul; 82(3):283-94. PubMed ID: 2375381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional rendered imaging of the human skull acquired from multi-detector row computed tomography.
Jung H; Kim HJ; Kim DO; Hong SI; Jeong HK; Kim KD; Kim Y; Yoo S; Yoo H
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 12532254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photogrammetry vs CT Scan: Evaluation of Accuracy of a Low-Cost Three-Dimensional Acquisition Method for Forensic Facial Approximation.
Donato L; Cecchi R; Goldoni M; Ubelaker DH
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1260-1265. PubMed ID: 32216148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional modelling and morphometric analysis of skull of badger (Meles meles) with computed tomography images.
Aslan Kanmaz Y; Güzel BC; Baygeldi SB; Karan M
Vet Med Sci; 2024 Mar; 10(2):e1360. PubMed ID: 38372005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation coefficients in human skulls: significant sexual differences.
Rude J; Mertzlufft FO
Anthropol Anz; 1987 Dec; 45(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 3435091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
