BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9787648)

  • 21. The mammography controversy: when should you screen?
    Allen SS; Pruthi S
    J Fam Pract; 2011 Sep; 60(9):524-31. PubMed ID: 21901178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confusion about mammography: prevalence and consequences.
    Rimer BK; Halabi S; Strigo TS; Crawford Y; Lipkus IM
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999 May; 8(4):509-20. PubMed ID: 10839706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Each woman should decide for herself (the controversy and confusion about mammography for women in their 40s continues....).
    Richards MJ
    Wis Med J; 1997 Apr; 96(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 9128426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammography: review of the controversy, health disparities, and impact on young african american women.
    Kidd AD; Colbert AM; Jatoi I
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Jun; 19(3):E52-8. PubMed ID: 26000591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammography benefits for women under 50: a closer look at the controversy.
    Aiken LS; Jackson KM
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):235-42; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Women's responses to changes in U.S. Preventive Task Force's mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women.
    Allen JD; Bluethmann SM; Sheets M; Opdyke KM; Gates-Ferris K; Hurlbert M; Harden E
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Dec; 13():1169. PubMed ID: 24330527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in Canadian women's mammography rates since the implementation of mass screening programs.
    De Grasse CE; O'Connor AM; Boulet J; Edwards N; Bryant H; Breithaupt K
    Am J Public Health; 1999 Jun; 89(6):927-9. PubMed ID: 10358690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammography screening and the controversy concerning women aged 40 to 49.
    Kopans DB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1273-90. PubMed ID: 7480670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions.
    Rimer BK; Halabi S; Sugg Skinner C; Kaplan EB; Crawford Y; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Lipkus IM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2001 Jun; 43(3):269-85. PubMed ID: 11384825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Complicating the mammography message.
    Blacksher E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(2):48. PubMed ID: 9131352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Women's approaches to decision making about mammography.
    Lewis ML; Corcoran-Perry SA; Narayan SM; Lally RM
    Cancer Nurs; 1999 Oct; 22(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 10526431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening and cognitive impairment: ethics of forgoing mammography in older women.
    Raik BL; Miller FG; Fins JJ
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Mar; 52(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 14962162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The mammography guideline controversy: where does the consumer fit in?
    Sutton SM; Eisner EJ; Johnston CM
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1994; 49(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 8169300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Controversy regarding screening mammography under age 50: to screen or not to screen.
    Castor WR
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):878-9. PubMed ID: 8497654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Mammography screening is not a question of women's rights].
    Lakartidningen; 1988 Nov; 85(48):4200-1. PubMed ID: 3200034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lessons from the mammography wars.
    Burke HB
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Dec; 363(26):2569; author reply 2570. PubMed ID: 21175335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammography Controversy: NIH's Entree into Evaluating Technology.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1977 Oct; 198(4313):171-3. PubMed ID: 17755347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 2. Mammography in clinical practice.
    J ICRU; 2009 Dec; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 24174596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response to: "[Yaffe's] Response to: 'Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective'".
    Miller AB
    Curr Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):e322-3. PubMed ID: 27330367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Controversy about hypertension screening in children: a public health perspective.
    Chiolero A; Bovet P; Paradis G
    J Hypertens; 2015 Jul; 33(7):1352-5. PubMed ID: 25882862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.