167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9787838)
1. Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data: statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones.
Zou KH; Tempany CM; Fielding JR; Silverman SG
Acad Radiol; 1998 Oct; 5(10):680-7. PubMed ID: 9787838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian regression methodology for estimating a receiver operating characteristic curve with two radiologic applications: prostate biopsy and spiral CT of ureteral stones.
Omalley AJ; Zou KH; Fielding JR; Tempany CM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):713-25. PubMed ID: 11508750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical validation based on parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis of continuous classification data.
Zou KH; Warfield SK; Fielding JR; Tempany CM; William MW; Kaus MR; Jolesz FA; Kikinis R
Acad Radiol; 2003 Dec; 10(12):1359-68. PubMed ID: 14697004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT-based determination of maximum ureteral stone area: a predictor of spontaneous passage.
Demehri S; Steigner ML; Sodickson AD; Houseman EA; Rybicki FJ; Silverman SG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 22357999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment.
Fielding JR; Silverman SG; Samuel S; Zou KH; Loughlin KR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Oct; 171(4):1051-3. PubMed ID: 9762995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of renal parenchymal density difference on unenhanced helical computed tomography scan in acutely obstructing ureteral stone disease.
Ozer C; Yencilek E; Apaydin FD; Duce MN; Yildiz A; Erdem E; Kanik A; Cayan S
Urology; 2004 Aug; 64(2):223-6; discussion 226-7. PubMed ID: 15302464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do we really need kidneys-ureters-bladder radiography to predict stone radiopacity before treatment with shockwave lithotripsy? Development and internal validation of a novel predictive model based on computed tomography parameters.
Sfoungaristos S; Hidas G; Gofrit ON; Yutkin V; Latke A; Landau EH; Pode D; Duvdevani M
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 25945651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT Use Reduction In Ostensive Ureteral Stone (CURIOUS).
Durant EJ; Engelhart DC; Ma AA; Warton EM; Arasu VA; Bernal R; Rauchwerger AS; Reed ME; Vinson DR
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 May; 67():168-175. PubMed ID: 36898306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: Automated 3D-measurements perform equal to radiologists, and linear measurements equal to volumetric.
Jendeberg J; Geijer H; Alshamari M; Lidén M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2474-2483. PubMed ID: 29368161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
Langenauer J; Betschart P; Hechelhammer L; Güsewell S; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Abt D; Zumstein V
World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2073-2080. PubMed ID: 29845319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?
Xun Y; Li J; Geng Y; Liu Z; Yu X; Wang X; Xiao F; Li Z; Li C; Wang S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():84-89. PubMed ID: 30292278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of ureteral stones and phleboliths using Hounsfield units on computerized tomography: a new method without observer bias.
Tanidir Y; Sahan A; Asutay MK; Sener TE; Talibzade F; Garayev A; Tinay I; Sekerci CA; Simsek F
Urolithiasis; 2017 Jun; 45(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 27638519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.
Coll DM; Varanelli MJ; Smith RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 11756098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive value of secondary signs of obstruction in follow-up computed tomography of ureteral stones: a study with dynamic computed tomography.
Sahlén K; Dahlman P; Brekkan E; Lönnemark M; Sahlén G; Segelsjö M; Magnusson A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Feb; 52(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 29037128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in stone size and ureteral dilation between obstructing proximal and distal ureteral calculi.
Eisner BH; Pedro R; Namasivayam S; Kambadakone A; Sahani DV; Dretler SP; Monga M
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):517-20. PubMed ID: 18502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis.
Park JS; Kim DW; Lee D; Lee T; Koo KC; Han WK; Chung BH; Lee KS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260517. PubMed ID: 34851999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the patients with flank pain in the emergency department by modified STONE score.
Bahadirli S; Sen AB; Bulut M; Kaya S
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Sep; 47():158-163. PubMed ID: 33813147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of semiparametric, parametric, and nonparametric ROC analysis for continuous diagnostic tests using a simulation study and acute coronary syndrome data.
Colak E; Mutlu F; Bal C; Oner S; Ozdamar K; Gok B; Cavusoglu Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():698320. PubMed ID: 22844346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
