These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9788427)
21. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics. Gopal A; Samant SS Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. Antonuk LE; Jee KW; El-Mohri Y; Maolinbay M; Nassif S; Rong X; Zhao Q; Siewerdsen JH; Street RA; Shah KS Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):289-306. PubMed ID: 10718132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A piecewise-focused high DQE detector for MV imaging. Star-Lack J; Shedlock D; Swahn D; Humber D; Wang A; Hirsh H; Zentai G; Sawkey D; Kruger I; Sun M; Abel E; Virshup G; Shin M; Fahrig R Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5084-99. PubMed ID: 26328960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detective quantum efficiency of a direct-detection active matrix flat panel imager at megavoltage energies. Lachaine M; Fourkal E; Fallone BG Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1364-72. PubMed ID: 11488567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High-DQE EPIDs based on thick, segmented BGO and CsI:Tl scintillators: performance evaluation at extremely low dose. Wang Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; El-Mohri Y; Perna L Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5707-18. PubMed ID: 20095283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigation of a direct conversion flat panel imager for portal imaging. Pang G; Lee DL; Rowlands JA Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2121-8. PubMed ID: 11695774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of a hybrid direct-indirect active matrix flat-panel imager using Monte Carlo simulation. Dow S; Howansky A; Lubinsky AR; Zhao W J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 May; 7(3):033501. PubMed ID: 32411813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. An investigation of signal performance enhancements achieved through innovative pixel design across several generations of indirect detection, active matrix, flat-panel arrays. Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; El-Mohri Y; Du H; Wang Y; Street RA; Ho J; Weisfield R; Yao W Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3322-39. PubMed ID: 19673228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. SU-E-J-09: Performance Optimization of Thick, Segmented Scintillators for Radiotherapy Imaging. El-Mohri Y; Choroszucha R; Antonuk L; Zhao Q; Jiang H Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3654. PubMed ID: 28517587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a novel high quantum efficiency MV x-ray detector for image-guided radiotherapy: A feasibility study. Liu J; Xu Y; Teymurazyan A; Papandreou Z; Pang G Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):152-163. PubMed ID: 31682020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements. Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization. Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. Richard S; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1397-413. PubMed ID: 15984691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis. Zhao C; Kanicki J Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Monte Carlo simulation of a quantum noise limited Čerenkov detector based on air-spaced light guiding taper for megavoltage x-ray imaging. Teymurazyan A; Rowlands JA; Pang G Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041907. PubMed ID: 24694138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications. Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. Spahn M; Strotzer M; Völk M; Böhm S; Geiger B; Hahm G; Feuerbach S Invest Radiol; 2000 Apr; 35(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 10764095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Ferrari P; Tassoni D Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Jaffray DA; Siewerdsen JH Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1311-23. PubMed ID: 10902561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Overestimations in zero frequency DQE of x-ray imaging converters assessed by Monte Carlo techniques based on the study of energy impartation events. Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4440-50. PubMed ID: 21859045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]