These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9790188)

  • 1. Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus components in human stereopsis.
    Farell B
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6703):689-93. PubMed ID: 9790188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis?
    Westheimer G; McKee SP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Jun; 18(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 447460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence.
    Liu L; Stevenson SB; Schor CM
    Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6458):66-9. PubMed ID: 8107776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching.
    van Ee R; Anderson BL
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):690-4. PubMed ID: 11287955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry.
    Hayashi R; Maeda T; Shimojo S; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2367-80. PubMed ID: 15246753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity.
    Ito H
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):931-42. PubMed ID: 15644231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transparency and the uniqueness constraint in human and computer stereo vision.
    Pollard SB; Frisby JP
    Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6293):553-6. PubMed ID: 2215681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Higher-contrast is preferred to equal-contrast in stereo-matching.
    Petrov Y
    Vision Res; 2004 Apr; 44(8):775-84. PubMed ID: 14967204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereoscopic depth aftereffects without retinal position correspondence between adaptation and test stimuli.
    Taya S; Sato M; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1857-66. PubMed ID: 15797775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slant perception, and its voluntary control, do not govern the slant aftereffect: multiple slant signals adapt independently.
    Knapen T; van Ee R
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3381-92. PubMed ID: 16698056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
    Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape.
    Cumming BG; Johnston EB; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1991 Jan; 349(6308):411-3. PubMed ID: 1992341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perisaccadic stereo depth with zero retinal disparity.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor CR; Schor CM
    Curr Biol; 2010 Jul; 20(13):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20619816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients.
    Watanabe Y; Kezuka T; Harasawa K; Usui M; Yaguchi H; Shioiri S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17596334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust and optimal use of information in stereo vision.
    Porrill J; Frisby JP; Adams WJ; Buckley D
    Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6714):63-6. PubMed ID: 9892353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor C; Ghose T; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4.
    Tanabe S; Doi T; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.