These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9790321)

  • 1. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents.
    Robb SI; Sadowsky C; Schneider BJ; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 9790321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment.
    al Yami EA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 9770102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [PAR index of adolescents with congenital missing teeth pre- and post-orthodontic treatment].
    Zhang XG; Huang N; Chen YX; He QC
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 May; 39(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 18575347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.
    de Freitas KM; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Henriques JF; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):428.e9-14. PubMed ID: 17920494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic treatment outcome in a First Nations population in Alberta, Canada: a comparative study.
    Cadman KC; Glover KE; Heo G; Warren S; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 11997764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
    DeGuzman L; Bahiraei D; Vig KW; Vig PS; Weyant RJ; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 7847276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in a Medicaid population.
    Mirabelli JT; Huang GJ; Siu CH; King GJ; Omnell L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 15877040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors related to orthodontic treatment time in adult patients.
    Melo AC; Carneiro LO; Pontes LF; Cecim RL; de Mattos JN; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(5):59-63. PubMed ID: 24352389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective grading system, and comprehensive clinical assessment.
    Deguchi T; Honjo T; Fukunaga T; Miyawaki S; Roberts WE; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):434-43. PubMed ID: 15821688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.
    Vu CQ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Ofner S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method of evaluating posterior occlusion and its relation to posttreatment occlusal changes.
    Parkinson CE; Buschang PH; Behrents RG; Throckmorton GS; English JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Nov; 120(5):503-12. PubMed ID: 11709669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the reliability and validity of the PAR Index and Summers' Occlusal Index.
    Buchanan IB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; O'Brien KD; Andrews M
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 8436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    Holman JK; Hans MG; Nelson S; Powers MP
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 9851350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The first 100 cases of orthodontic treatment: one year out of retention.
    Fox NA; Chadwick SC
    Dent Update; 1994 Sep; 21(7):288-92, 294-7. PubMed ID: 7875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of Class II, division 1 treatment.
    O'Brien KD; Robbins R; Vig KW; Vig PS; Shnorhokian H; Weyant R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 7879767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: part 1-duration of treatment.
    Yassir YA; El-Angbawi AM; McIntyre GT; Revie GF; Bearn DR
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 Mar; 41(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 30007300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Roth appliance and standard edgewise appliance treatment results.
    Kattner PF; Schneider BJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jan; 103(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 8422027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index.
    Gu J; Tang JS; Skulski B; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Kim DG; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 28153154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    DiBiase AT; Nasr IH; Scott P; Cobourne MT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e111-6. PubMed ID: 21300221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.