These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9790358)

  • 1. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
    Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
    Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography.
    Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison.
    Owen J; Neely C; Northen A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 10521728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Raungrongmorakot K; Tanmoun N; Ruangvutilert P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Tontisirin P; Butsansee W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Mar; 87(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15117051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?
    Saul LL; Kurtzman JT; Hagemann C; Ghamsary M; Wing DA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1305-11. PubMed ID: 18716140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor.
    Gauthier T; Marin B; Garuchet-Bigot A; Kanoun D; Catalan C; Caly H; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 24728104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation.
    Songserm V; Komwilaisak R; Saksiriwuttho P; Kongwattanakul K
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 Sep; 47(7):389-393. PubMed ID: 31245845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques.
    Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical length at 31-34 weeks of gestation: transvaginal vs. transperineal ultrasonographic approach.
    Tsakiridis I; Dagklis T; Mamopoulos A; Gerede A; Athanasiadis A
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Oct; 47(8):817-821. PubMed ID: 31421047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
    Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery.
    Onderoğlu LS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Dec; 59(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 9486511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
    Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of prolonged pregnancy in nulliparous women by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length at 20-24 weeks and 37 weeks.
    Suh YH; Park KH; Hong JS; Noh JH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Feb; 22(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 17297257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
    Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging.
    Hertzberg BS; Livingston E; DeLong DM; McNally PJ; Fazekas CK; Kliewer MA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Oct; 20(10):1071-8; quiz 1080. PubMed ID: 11587014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
    Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery.
    Yazici G; Yildiz A; Tiras MB; Arslan M; Kanik A; Oz U
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2004 Jun; 32(5):225-30. PubMed ID: 15124188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review.
    Crane JM; Hutchens D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 31(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 18412093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.