142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9790358)
1. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography.
Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperineal versus endovaginal ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in the midtrimester: a blinded comparison.
Owen J; Neely C; Northen A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 10521728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography.
Raungrongmorakot K; Tanmoun N; Ruangvutilert P; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Tontisirin P; Butsansee W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Mar; 87(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 15117051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?
Saul LL; Kurtzman JT; Hagemann C; Ghamsary M; Wing DA
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1305-11. PubMed ID: 18716140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor.
Gauthier T; Marin B; Garuchet-Bigot A; Kanoun D; Catalan C; Caly H; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 24728104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation.
Songserm V; Komwilaisak R; Saksiriwuttho P; Kongwattanakul K
J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 Sep; 47(7):389-393. PubMed ID: 31245845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques.
Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical length at 31-34 weeks of gestation: transvaginal vs. transperineal ultrasonographic approach.
Tsakiridis I; Dagklis T; Mamopoulos A; Gerede A; Athanasiadis A
J Perinat Med; 2019 Oct; 47(8):817-821. PubMed ID: 31421047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery.
Onderoğlu LS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Dec; 59(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 9486511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of prolonged pregnancy in nulliparous women by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length at 20-24 weeks and 37 weeks.
Suh YH; Park KH; Hong JS; Noh JH
J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Feb; 22(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 17297257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging.
Hertzberg BS; Livingston E; DeLong DM; McNally PJ; Fazekas CK; Kliewer MA
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Oct; 20(10):1071-8; quiz 1080. PubMed ID: 11587014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery.
Yazici G; Yildiz A; Tiras MB; Arslan M; Kanik A; Oz U
J Clin Ultrasound; 2004 Jun; 32(5):225-30. PubMed ID: 15124188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review.
Crane JM; Hutchens D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 31(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 18412093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
