These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9791215)

  • 1. The feel of steel, Part 1.
    Rozen J
    Dent Today; 1998 Apr; 17(4):58-60, 62-5. PubMed ID: 9791215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Manual or rotary root canal preparation? Nickel-titanium or stainless steel? Review of the literature].
    Beun S; Bogaerts P; Van Nieuwenhuysen JP
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16082877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
    Schäfer E; Lau R
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Best of both worlds: stainless steel and nickel titanium.
    Klein P
    Dent Today; 1999 Jul; 18(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files.
    Thomas AS; Hartwell GR; Moon PC
    J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):662-3. PubMed ID: 14606791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests.
    Kazemi RB; Stenman E; Spångberg LS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 11027388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endodontic instrument sizing--a review.
    Shipper G
    SADJ; 1998 Oct; 53(10):473-8. PubMed ID: 10023269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The feel of steel, Part 2: Getting to the point.
    Rozen J
    Dent Today; 1998 Jun; 17(6):56-8, 60-1. PubMed ID: 9796451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
    Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
    J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The virtue of common sense in endodontics.
    Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Dent Today; 2006 Aug; 25(8):72, 74, 76-7. PubMed ID: 16925165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endodontic K-files: invaluable endangered species or ready for the Smithsonian?
    Mounce R
    Dent Today; 2005 Jul; 24(7):102, 104. PubMed ID: 16092563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of three instrumentation techniques on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from a root canal: an in vitro study.
    Colak M; Evcil S; Bayindir YZ; Yigit N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 15719081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Wilson P; Speisser JM; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):736-9. PubMed ID: 9855824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel spreader penetration and accessory cone fit in curved canals.
    Schmidt KJ; Walker TL; Johnson JD; Nicoll BK
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 11194365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating nickel titanium instrumentation into your practice.
    Dovgan JS
    Dent Today; 1998 Oct; 17(10):86-8, 90-3. PubMed ID: 10752435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.