95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9791576)
1. [The role of the medical corps in a mass screening program for cervical cancer. The program "Female Health Action in 3 urban districts of Lyons].
Mignotte H; Perol D; Fontanière B; Nachury LP; Lasset C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Sep; 27(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 9791576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The "Action Woman Health" program in three Lyons suburbs].
Mignotte H; Le Goaziou MF; Nachury LP; Pérol D; Fontaniere B; Fouillat V; Lasset C
Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():45-58. PubMed ID: 10989628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast, cervical and colo-rectal simultaneous mass screening program for women 50 to 69 years old in Isere].
Garnier A; Exbrayat C; Marron J; Seigneurin D; Winckel P; Bolla M
Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():59-69. PubMed ID: 10989629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cervical cancer screening for high risk women: is it possible? Results of a cervical cancer screening program in three suburban districts of Lyon].
Mignotte H; Perol D; Fontanière B; Nachury LP; Blanc-Jouvand A; Fouillat V; Chauvin F; Lasset C
Bull Cancer; 1999 Jun; 86(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 10417430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge and participation of general practitioners in cervical cancer screening: survey in a French pilot area.
Monnet E; Mauny F; Marquant A; Michaud C; Ferry JP
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1998 Mar; 46(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 9592853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Obstacles and reticences in the screening of cancer of the cervix by the general practitioner].
Weil O; Schaffer P
Bull Cancer; 1994 Apr; 81(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 7703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The gynecologist's role in mammography screening in absence of a public health program.
Chamot E; Perneger TV
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12768296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cervical cancer screening in the Bas-Rhin. Evaluation of four and a half years of the EVE campaign].
Fender M; Schaffer P; Dellenbach P
Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():11-20. PubMed ID: 10989625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervical cancer screening campaign in Doubs: evaluation of the first three years of the pilot program].
Gautier CP; Monnet E; Meslans Y
Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():37-43. PubMed ID: 10989627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Can we and must we organize cervical cancer screening in France? Results of the pilot project "EVE" in the department of Bas-Rhin].
Fender M; Schaffer P; Dellenbach P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Nov; 27(7):683-91. PubMed ID: 9921438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of a cervical cancer screening programme from an area of Barcelona (Spain) with a large immigrant population.
Casamitjana M; Sala M; Ochoa D; Fusté P; Castells X; Alameda F;
Eur J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 19(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 19435798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General practitioners' perception of risk factors for cervical cancer development: consequences for patient education.
Baay MF; Verhoeven V; Peremans L; Avonts D; Vermorken JB
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 16533588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge, attitude and practice of screening for cervical cancer among female students of a tertiary institution in South Eastern Nigeria.
Akujobi CN; Ikechebelu JI; Onunkwo I; Onyiaorah IV
Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Sep; 11(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 19140357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Barriers in screening for cervical cancer].
Espersen MM; Holten IW
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Nov; 167(46):4371-4. PubMed ID: 16287523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening practices among general practitioners in Lagos Nigeria.
Anorlu RI; Ribiu KA; Abudu OO; Ola ER
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 17454471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
