451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9791784)
1. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown.
May KB; Russell MM; Razzoog ME; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 9791784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns.
Kokubo Y; Ohkubo C; Tsumita M; Miyashita A; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jul; 32(7):526-30. PubMed ID: 15975133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
Nakamura T; Tanaka H; Kinuta S; Akao T; Okamoto K; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):456-9. PubMed ID: 16279739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns.
Boening KW; Wolf BH; Schmidt AE; Kästner K; Walter MH
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 11044849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro study of the compressive load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with varying thickness of veneer porcelain.
Webber B; McDonald A; Knowles J
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 12616235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems.
Yeo IS; Yang JH; Lee JB
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 14586310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system.
Kokubo Y; Nagayama Y; Tsumita M; Ohkubo C; Fukushima S; Vult von Steyern P
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 16159354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
