178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9791799)
1. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration on void formation in dies poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
Abdullah MA
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 9791799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparation of void-free casts from vinyl polysiloxane impressions.
Sherfudhin H; Abdulla MA
J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):95-8. PubMed ID: 8636501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration and role of a surfactant on void formation in models poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
Reddy NK; Aparna I
J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 21814356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
Endo T; Finger WJ
Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
Gerrow JD; Price RB
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
Tjan AH; Li T
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry.
Derrien G; Le Menn G
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7674178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
