These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9792878)

  • 1. A comparative study of sibship tests of linkage and/or association.
    Monks SA; Kaplan NL; Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Nov; 63(5):1507-16. PubMed ID: 9792878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Spielman RS; Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Feb; 62(2):450-8. PubMed ID: 9463321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families.
    Martin ER; Kaplan NL; Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Aug; 61(2):439-48. PubMed ID: 9311750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sibship T2 association tests of complex diseases for tightly linked markers.
    Fan R; Knapp M
    Hum Genomics; 2005 Jun; 2(2):90-112. PubMed ID: 16004725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease.
    Schaid DJ; Rowland C
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Nov; 63(5):1492-506. PubMed ID: 9792877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data.
    Horvath S; Laird NM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Dec; 63(6):1886-97. PubMed ID: 9837840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling.
    Risch N; Teng J
    Genome Res; 1998 Dec; 8(12):1273-88. PubMed ID: 9872982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies.
    Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(Pt 4):319-33. PubMed ID: 9365785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical properties of the allelic and genotypic transmission/disequilibrium test for multiallelic markers.
    Bickeböller H; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):865-70. PubMed ID: 8788023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of family structure on linkage tests using allelic association.
    Whittaker JC; Lewis CM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):889-97. PubMed ID: 9718338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association.
    McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
    Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
    Whittemore AS; Tu IP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance.
    Morton NE; Collins A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Sep; 95(19):11389-93. PubMed ID: 9736746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disease associations and family-based tests.
    Ewens WJ; Spielman RS; Kaplan NL; Gao X; Morris RW; Martin ER
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; Chapter 1():Unit 1.12. PubMed ID: 18633973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotype relative-risks and association tests for nuclear families with missing parental data.
    Schaid DJ; Li H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 9433633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.