These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9792878)

  • 41. A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees: the pedigree disequilibrium test.
    Martin ER; Monks SA; Warren LL; Kaplan NL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 10825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Family-based tests of association in the presence of linkage.
    Lake SL; Blacker D; Laird NM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Dec; 67(6):1515-25. PubMed ID: 11058432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases. II. Individual genotyping.
    Teng J; Risch N
    Genome Res; 1999 Mar; 9(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 10077529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tests for genetic association using family data.
    Shih MC; Whittemore AS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):128-45. PubMed ID: 11788959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The transmission/disequilibrium test for linkage on the X chromosome.
    Ho GY; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1158-60. PubMed ID: 10712228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mapping disease genes: family-based association studies.
    Thomson G
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Aug; 57(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 7668275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
    Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of age at onset on the power of the affected sib pair and transmission/disequilibrium tests.
    Li H; Hsu L
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 May; 64(Pt 3):239-54. PubMed ID: 11246475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A flexible model for association analysis in sibships with missing genotype data.
    Dudbridge F; Holmans PA; Wilson SG
    Ann Hum Genet; 2011 May; 75(3):428-38. PubMed ID: 21241274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mapping genes that underlie ethnic differences in disease risk: methods for detecting linkage in admixed populations, by conditioning on parental admixture.
    McKeigue PM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 63(1):241-51. PubMed ID: 9634509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships.
    Ehm M; Wagner M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 9443861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus.
    Monks SA; Kaplan NL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):576-92. PubMed ID: 10677318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Sib TDT adjusted for age of disease onset.
    Ghosh S; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 May; 68(Pt 3):249-56. PubMed ID: 15180705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Haplotype association analysis for late onset diseases using nuclear family data.
    Li C; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 30(3):220-30. PubMed ID: 16470533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating relative risks from significant family-based association studies.
    Knapp M
    Hum Hered; 2008; 66(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 18382090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Application of 'Family-Based Association Test' in studying genetic epidemiology].
    Pei LJ; Li CF; Zhang L; Song XM; Zheng XY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1255-9. PubMed ID: 19173976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.