These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9793791)

  • 41. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical data.
    Capodanno D; Stone GW; Morice MC; Bass TA; Tamburino C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(14):1426-32. PubMed ID: 21939824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do hybrid procedures have proven clinical utility and are they the wave of the future? : hybrid procedures have no proven clinical utility and are not the wave of the future.
    Leacche M; Zhao DX; Umakanthan R; Byrne JG
    Circulation; 2012 May; 125(20):2504-10; discussion 2510. PubMed ID: 22615421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Fox guarding the clinical trial: internal vs. external validity in randomized studies.
    Goodwin PJ; Pritchard KI; Spiegel D
    Psychooncology; 1999; 8(3):275. PubMed ID: 10390742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. 5-Year follow-up of coronary revascularization in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS (arterial revascularization therapy study)-II and ARTS-I trials.
    Onuma Y; Wykrzykowska JJ; Garg S; Vranckx P; Serruys PW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Mar; 4(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 21435610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Randomized controlled trials.
    Jainer AK; Chawla M
    Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Jun; 160(6):1189-90; author reply 1190. PubMed ID: 12777289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Hand searching for controlled clinical trials in German surgical journals. A contribution to evidence-based surgery].
    Blümle A; Antes G; Diener MK
    Chirurg; 2007 Nov; 78(11):1052-7. PubMed ID: 17622501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does percutaneous coronary intervention compromise the outcome of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting?
    Mack M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):765-6. PubMed ID: 19695545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics of OlmeSartan and calcium antagonists randomized (OSCAR) study: a study comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events between high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy and combination therapy of ARB with calcium channel blocker in Japanese elderly high-risk hypertensive patients (ClinicalTrials. gov no. NCT00134160).
    Ogawa H; Kim-Mitsuyama S; Jinnouchi T; Matsui K; Arakawa K
    Hypertens Res; 2009 Jul; 32(7):575-80. PubMed ID: 19444280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The AUTAX (Austrian Multivessel TAXUS-Stent) registry: another useful registry on stented angioplasty for multivessel disease?
    Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):728-30. PubMed ID: 19695540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prediction of survival after coronary revascularization: modeling short-term, mid-term, and long-term survival.
    MacKenzie TA; Malenka DJ; Olmstead EM; Piper WD; Langner C; Ross CS; O'Connor GT;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):463-72. PubMed ID: 19161761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Generalizability of the results of randomized trials.
    Weiss NS; Koepsell TD; Psaty BM
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 168(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 18227357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
    Nelson EA
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.
    Sutton AJ; Abrams KR; Jones DR; Sheldon TA; Song F
    Health Technol Assess; 1998; 2(19):1-276. PubMed ID: 10347832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evidence for non-random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh.
    Carlisle JB; Loadsman JA
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 27988952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Current evidence-based situation in coronary revascularization--CABG vs. PCI and diabetes?].
    Grapow MT; von Wattenwyl R; Zerkowski HR
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 95 Suppl 1():i31-4. PubMed ID: 16598545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
    Kapur A; Bartolini D; Finlay MC; Qureshi AC; Flather M; Strange JW; Hall RJ
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2010 Jan; 11(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19797974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Randomized controlled trials in long-term care residents with dementia: a systematic review.
    Mills EJ; Chow TW
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2003; 4(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 14613596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Selecting computer-based evidence sources.
    Wyatt JC; Vincent S
    Ann Oncol; 1999 Mar; 10(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 10355569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Moving beyond randomized controlled trials.
    Chaulk CP; Kazandjian VA
    Am J Public Health; 2004 Sep; 94(9):1476. PubMed ID: 15333296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Randomized trials in coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Frye RL; Fisher L; Schaff HV; Gersh BJ; Vlietstra RE; Mock MB
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1987; 30(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 3299489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.