These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves. Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta. Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Bileaflet Heart valves. Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8162222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated macro/micro approach to evaluating pivot flow within the Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet mechanical heart valve. Shu MC; Gross JM; O'Rourke KK; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):503-12. PubMed ID: 12918854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure and flow fields in the hinge region of bileaflet mechanical heart valves. Gao ZB; Hosein N; Dai FF; Hwang NH J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Mar; 8(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 10224581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and Laser Doppler Anemometry velocity measurements downstream of replacement heart valves: implications for in vivo assessment of prosthetic valve function. Fontaine AA; Heinrich RS; Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Scheidegger MB; Boesiger P; Walton SP; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 8834728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance. Walker DK; Brendzel AM; Scotten LN J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator. Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy. Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bubble formation on St. Jude Medical mechanical heart valves: an in-vitro study. Milo S; Gutfinger C; Chu GY; Gharib M J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 May; 12(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12803343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Principal stress analysis in LDA measurement of the flow field downstream of 19-mm Sorin Bicarbon heart valve. Barbaro V; Grigioni M; Daniele C; D'Avenio G Technol Health Care; 1998 Nov; 6(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 9924953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves. Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental study on the Reynolds and viscous shear stress of bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a pneumatic ventricular assist device. Lee H; Tatsumi E; Taenaka Y ASAIO J; 2009; 55(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19521236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]