These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9793914)

  • 1. [Intraocular lens calculation and ultrasound biometry: immersion and contact procedures].
    Hoffmann PC; Hütz WW; Eckhardt HB; Heuring AH
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Sep; 213(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 9793914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction].
    Hrebcová J; Skorkovská S; Vasků A
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 19750832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of IOL calculations in children: a comparison of immersion versus contact A-scan biometery.
    Ben-Zion I; Neely DE; Plager DA; Ofner S; Sprunger DT; Roberts GJ
    J AAPOS; 2008 Oct; 12(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 18599330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.
    Turhan SA; Toker E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 26114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immersion B-guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes.
    Abu El Einen KG; Shalaby MH; El Shiwy HT
    Retina; 2011 Feb; 31(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 20829737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in biometry prediction error and intra-ocular lens power calculation formula.
    Behndig A; Montan P; Lundström M; Zetterström C; Kugelberg M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):759-63. PubMed ID: 24930806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    de Sanctis U; Damiani F; Brusasco L; Grignolo F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 156(2):254-259.e1. PubMed ID: 23870359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.
    Ianchulev T; Salz J; Hoffer K; Albini T; Hsu H; Labree L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 16129287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry].
    Hrebcová J; Vasků A
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2008 Jan; 64(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 18225494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Individual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery -- a comparison of optical and acoustical biometry].
    Kutschan A; Wiegand W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):743-8. PubMed ID: 15459840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.
    Rose LT; Moshegov CN
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 12648044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract.
    Trivedi RH; Wilson ME
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Mar; 118(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 21035871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis.
    Haigis W; Lege B; Miller N; Schneider B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Sep; 238(9):765-73. PubMed ID: 11045345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].
    Yang Q; Chen B; Peng G; Li Z; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 50(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 24709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement and reproducibility of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Kitthaweesin K; Mungsing W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Aug; 92(8):1046-9. PubMed ID: 19694329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of ultrasound and optic biometry with respect to ocular refraction after cataract surgery].
    Skorkovská S; Michálek J; Ruberová M; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15011303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraocular lens power calculation by ray-tracing after myopic excimer laser surgery.
    Savini G; Bedei A; Barboni P; Ducoli P; Hoffer KJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):150-153.e1. PubMed ID: 24099275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas.
    Narváez J; Zimmerman G; Stulting RD; Chang DH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2050-3. PubMed ID: 17137982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
    Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.