These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9793941)

  • 1. Intrapartum fetal hypoxia and biochemical markers: a review.
    Nordström L; Arulkumaran S
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1998 Oct; 53(10):645-57. PubMed ID: 9793941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Ayres-de-Campos D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():1-2. PubMed ID: 26302973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of cerebral palsy during labour: role of foetal lactate.
    Borruto F; Comparetto C; Treisser A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 278(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18071726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biophysical and biochemical intrapartum fetal assessment in relation to hematological varaiables in umbilical cord blood].
    Redźko S; Przepieść J; Zak J; Wysocka J; Urban J
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):527-31, 534-5. PubMed ID: 17076203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The physiology of intrapartum fetal compromise at term.
    Turner JM; Mitchell MD; Kumar SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 31351061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introduction: Why is intrapartum foetal monitoring necessary - Impact on outcomes and interventions.
    Ayres-de-Campos D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():3-8. PubMed ID: 26189688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on past and present situation of intensive monitoring of the fetus during labor.
    Saling E
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8708934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Umbilical cord blood erythroblast count as an index of intrauterine hypoxia.
    Thilaganathan B; Athanasiou S; Ozmen S; Creighton S; Watson NR; Nicolaides KH
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 1994 May; 70(3):F192-4. PubMed ID: 8198413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is intrapartum fetal blood sampling a gold standard diagnostic tool for fetal distress?
    Mahendru AA; Lees CC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 21300427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Outcome measures in perinatal medicine--pO2 and SO2. With remarks on pulse oximetry].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2005 Oct; 209(5):173-85. PubMed ID: 16317628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lactate production as a response to intrapartum hypoxia in the growth-restricted fetus.
    Holzmann M; Cnattingius S; Nordström L
    BJOG; 2012 Sep; 119(10):1265-9. PubMed ID: 22804901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expert review--identification of intra-partum fetal compromise.
    Prior T; Kumar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jul; 190():1-6. PubMed ID: 25917435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Significance of intrapartum hypoxia for cerebral long-term morbidity].
    Schneider H
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1996; 200(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 8767286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N; Giunta G; Gallo DM; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 26094952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Valiño N; Giunta G; Gallo DM; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 47(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 26224608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Litigation related to intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Schifrin BS; Soliman M; Koos B
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():87-97. PubMed ID: 26227999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the fetus at risk for cardiopulmonary compromise.
    Vento M; Teramo K
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Dec; 18(6):324-9. PubMed ID: 24055407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.