These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9794849)

  • 1. Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.
    Featherstone K; Donovan JL
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1177-80. PubMed ID: 9794849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial.
    Featherstone K; Donovan JL
    Soc Sci Med; 2002 Sep; 55(5):709-19. PubMed ID: 12190265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?
    Kerr C; Robinson E; Stevens A; Braunholtz D; Edwards S; Lilford R
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 14872081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr C; Stevens A; Lilford R; Braunholtz D; Edwards S
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):811-24. PubMed ID: 14672595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa.
    Moodley K; Pather M; Myer L
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Dec; 31(12):727-32. PubMed ID: 16319239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study.
    Mills N; Donovan JL; Smith M; Jacoby A; Neal DE; Hamdy FC
    Control Clin Trials; 2003 Jun; 24(3):272-82. PubMed ID: 12757993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention.
    Heaven B; Murtagh M; Rapley T; May C; Graham R; Kaner E; Thomson R
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 16181766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surrendering control, or nothing to lose: Parents' preferences about participation in a randomised trial of childhood strabismus surgery.
    Buck D; Hogan V; Powell CJ; Sloper JJ; Speed C; Taylor RH; Tiffin P; Clarke MP;
    Clin Trials; 2015 Aug; 12(4):384-93. PubMed ID: 25805203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.
    Ryan RE; Prictor MJ; McLaughlin KJ; Hill SJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD003717. PubMed ID: 18254029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is this thing called "randomise"?
    Mason S; Brown J; Levene M
    Lancet; 1997 Nov; 350(9089):1416. PubMed ID: 9371163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Community perspectives on randomisation and fairness in a cluster randomised controlled trial in Zambia.
    Kombe MM; Zulu JM; Michelo C; Sandøy IF
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):99. PubMed ID: 31864351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participant views and experiences of participating in HIV research in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review.
    Nalubega S; Evans C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jun; 13(5):330-420. PubMed ID: 26455613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.
    Edwards SJ; Lilford RJ; Hewison J
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1209-12. PubMed ID: 9794861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trial participants' self-reported understanding of randomisation phrases in participation information leaflets can be high, but acceptability of some descriptions is low, especially those linked to gambling and luck.
    Shiely F; Murphy E; Gilles K; Hood K; O'Sullivan L; Harman N; Isaacs T; Treweek S
    Trials; 2024 Jun; 25(1):391. PubMed ID: 38890748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials.
    Avins AL
    J Med Ethics; 1998 Dec; 24(6):401-8. PubMed ID: 9873981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.
    Corbett F; Oldham J; Lilford R
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Aug; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 8863148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.
    Whitesides LW; Baren JM; Biros MH; Fleischman RJ; Govindarajan PR; Jones EB; Pancioli AM; Pentz RD; Scicluna VM; Wright DW; Dickert NW
    Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 28359192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative exploration of trial-related terminology in a study involving Deaf British Sign Language users.
    Young A; Oram R; Dodds C; Nassimi-Green C; Belk R; Rogers K; Davies L; Lovell K
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 27121282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants.
    Pope JE; Tingey DP; Arnold JM; Hong P; Ouimet JM; Krizova A
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):815-24. PubMed ID: 12672205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.