These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9795438)
21. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Biomechanical analysis of lumbar spine after implantation of a disk prosthesis and supplementary spinal fusion for management of complications]. Birnbaum K; Phoa T; Maus U; Prescher A; Weisskopf M Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 19693744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A biomechanical evaluation of internal lumbar laminoplasty: the preservation of spinal stability during laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis. Efstathiou P; Moskovich R; Casar R; Magnisalis E Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1996; 55(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8771346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study. Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laminectomy and functional impairment of the lumbar spine: the importance of muscle forces in flexible and rigid instrumented stabilization--a biomechanical study in vitro. Quint U; Wilke HJ; Löer F; Claes L Eur Spine J; 1998; 7(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9684957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical rationale of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spondylolysis as an effective minimally invasive procedure - a study based on the finite element analysis. Sairyo K; Goel VK; Masuda A; Biyani A; Ebraheim N; Mishiro T; Terai T Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Apr; 48(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 15906208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis. Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study. Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intradiscal pressure and kinematic behavior of lumbar spine after bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. Rao RD; Wang M; Singhal P; McGrady LM; Rao S Spine J; 2002; 2(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 14589462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach. Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics. Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy: stenosis and stability. Subramaniam V; Chamberlain RH; Theodore N; Baek S; Safavi-Abbasi S; Senoğlu M; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):E573-8. PubMed ID: 19770600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacer. Kubo S; Goel VK; Yang SJ; Tajima N Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 12567022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Anatomical and surgical considerations. Spetzger U; Bertalanffy H; Naujokat C; von Keyserlingk DG; Gilsbach JM Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1997; 139(5):392-6. PubMed ID: 9204106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics. Zander T; Rohlmann A; Klöckner C; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2003 Aug; 12(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 12720068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies. Ho YH; Tu YK; Hsiao CK; Chang CH BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():208. PubMed ID: 26285817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]