These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9795611)
1. Anonymous poison pen letters vs allegations of scientific misconduct. Price AR Acad Med; 1998 Oct; 73(10):1027-8. PubMed ID: 9795611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anonymity and pseudonymity in whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity. Price AR Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 9609854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poison pen letters, due process, and medical schools' policies toward anonymous correspondence that disparages medical school faculty. Paola FA; Malik TK; Walker RM Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):534-7. PubMed ID: 9609868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson). Swazey JP Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11657862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students. Parrish DM Sci Eng Ethics; 2004 Jul; 10(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 15362705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. Rennie D BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy. Kornfeld DS Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spring helps research integrity report resurface. Marwick C JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]