These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9795649)

  • 1. Some methods for detecting and understanding test speededness on timed multiple-choice tests.
    Hadadi A; Luecht RM
    Acad Med; 1998 Oct; 73(10 Suppl):S47-50. PubMed ID: 9795649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are multiple choice tests fair to medical students with specific learning disabilities?
    Ricketts C; Brice J; Coombes L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 19763855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing medical students' clinical sciences knowledge in France: a collaboration between the NBME and a consortium of French medical schools.
    De Champlain AF; Melnick D; Scoles P; Subhiyah R; Holtzman K; Swanson D; Angelucci K; McGrenra C; Fournier JP; Benchimol D; Rampal P; Staccini P; Braun M; Kohler C; Guidet B; Claudepierre P; Prével M; Goldberg J
    Acad Med; 2003 May; 78(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 12742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical students' reasons for changing answers on multiple-choice tests.
    Harvill LM; Davis G
    Acad Med; 1997 Oct; 72(10 Suppl 1):S97-9. PubMed ID: 9347753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of physical therapy anatomy performance and anxiety scores in timed and untimed practical tests.
    Schwartz SM; Evans C; Agur AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(6):518-24. PubMed ID: 25516337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cueing on multiple choice items for medical students.
    Uguroglu ME; TenHaken JD; Ozog GJ; Shah J
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1981; 20():69-73. PubMed ID: 7347547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.
    Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students.
    Phisalprapa P; Muangkaew W; Assanasen J; Kunavisarut T; Thongngarm T; Ruchutrakool T; Kobwanthanakun S; Dejsomritrutai W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 27396231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do medical students remember multiple choice questions?
    Miller BJ; Effeney DJ; Gough IR
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1993 Nov; 63(11):897-900. PubMed ID: 8216070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of "fact-recall" with "higher-order" questions in multiple-choice examinations as predictors of clinical performance of medical students.
    Peitzman SJ; Nieman LZ; Gracely EJ
    Acad Med; 1990 Sep; 65(9 Suppl):S59-60. PubMed ID: 2400508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized study showing the benefit of medical study writing multiple choice questions on their learning.
    Herrero JI; Lucena F; Quiroga J
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jan; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 30704452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Accuracy of the Empirical Item Characteristic Curve Preequating Method in the Presence of Test Speededness.
    Qiu Y; Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 30911194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clarifying the Effect of Test Speededness.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):611-623. PubMed ID: 31551639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.
    Wagener S; Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Gornostayeva M; Schultz JH; Brüstle P; Mohr D; Vander Beken A; Better J; Fries M; Gottschalk M; Günther J; Herrmann L; Kreisel C; Moczko T; Illg C; Jassowicz A; Müller A; Niesert M; Strübing F; Jünger J
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc46. PubMed ID: 26483859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How accurate are our assumptions about our students' background knowledge?
    Rovick AA; Michael JA; Modell HI; Bruce DS; Horwitz B; Adamson T; Richardson DR; Silverthorn DU; Whitescarver SA
    Am J Physiol; 1999 Jun; 276(6 Pt 2):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16211673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directing students to profound open-book test preparation: the relationship between deep learning and open-book test time.
    Heijne-Penninga M; Kuks JB; Hofman WH; Cohen-Schotanus J
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(1):e16-21. PubMed ID: 21182369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. English proficiency in multiple-choice questions.
    Dissanayake AS; Ali BA; Nayar U
    Acad Med; 1990 Feb; 65(2):101. PubMed ID: 2302294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategy choices in multiple-choice items.
    Skakun EN; Maguire TO; Cook DA
    Acad Med; 1994 Oct; 69(10 Suppl):S7-9. PubMed ID: 7916834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between scores on developing cognitive abilities test and scores on medical college admissions test for nontraditional premedical students.
    Henry P; Bardo HR
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Aug; 67(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 2236420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.