These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9795808)
1. Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Zerahn B; Storgaard M; Johansen T; Olsen C; Lausten G; Kanstrup IL Int Orthop; 1998; 22(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9795808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Zerahn B; Lausten GS; Kanstrup IL Int Orthop; 2004 Jun; 28(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 14730398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stem length in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: Does it make a difference in bone remodeling? Samy AM; El-Tantawy A Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Aug; 29(6):1235-1242. PubMed ID: 30989339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling After Novel Short-Stem Neck-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty. Tran P; Zhang BX; Lade JA; Pianta RM; Unni RP; Haw CS J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2530-2535. PubMed ID: 27236743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes After Implantation of a Curved Bone Preserving Hip Stem Compared to a Standard Length Straight Stem: 5-Yr Results of a Prospective, Randomized DXA-Analysis. Meyer JS; Freitag T; Reichel H; Bieger R J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 30126775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation. Matsuyama K; Ishidou Y; Guo YM; Kakoi H; Setoguchi T; Nagano S; Kawamura I; Maeda S; Komiya S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17(1):397. PubMed ID: 27642748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of mechanical stress and change in bone mineral density between two types of femoral implant using finite element analysis. Hirata Y; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Fujimaki H; Saito T J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1731-5. PubMed ID: 23683518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No Difference in Periprosthetic Bone Loss and Fixation Between a Standard-Length Stem and a Shorter Version in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Schilcher J; Ivarsson I; Perlbach R; Palm L J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 27993496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periprosthetic bone loss after insertion of an uncemented, customized femoral stem and an uncemented anatomical stem. A randomized DXA study with 5-year follow-up. Nysted M; Benum P; Klaksvik J; Foss O; Aamodt A Acta Orthop; 2011 Aug; 82(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 21668387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Femoral periprosthetic bone remodelling to the proximal femur after implantation of custom made anatomic and standard straight stem hip prostheses]. Arabmotlagh M; Hennigs T; Rittmeister M Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 14551837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up]. Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Periprosthetic BMD after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study. Tapaninen T; Kröger H; Venesmaa P J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jul; 20(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 25850905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum and proximal femur after total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Huang Q; Shen B; Yang J; Zhou ZK; Kang PD; Pei FX J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1811-5. PubMed ID: 23618750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Niinimäki T; Junila J; Jalovaara P Int Orthop; 2001; 25(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 11409458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No medium-term advantage of electrochemical deposition of hydroxyapatite in cementless femoral stems. 5-year RSA and DXA results from a randomized controlled trial. Flatøy B; Röhrl SM; Bøe B; Nordsletten L Acta Orthop; 2016 Feb; 87(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 26364953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Bobyn JD; Mortimer ES; Glassman AH; Engh CA; Miller JE; Brooks CE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):79-96. PubMed ID: 1729025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty]. Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between stress shielding and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with extensively porous coated stems. Kwon DG; Lee TJ; Kang JS; Moon KH J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1728-30. PubMed ID: 23937922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty]. Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]