BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9796173)

  • 1. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis: the ongoing debate.
    Talley JD
    J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Oct; 95(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 9796173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction for mechanical reperfusion: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials.
    De Luca G; Biondi-Zoccai G; Marino P
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 52(6):665-76. PubMed ID: 19027496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study.
    Machecourt J; Bonnefoy E; Vanzetto G; Motreff P; Marlière S; Leizorovicz A; Allenet B; Lacroute JM; Cassagnes J; Touboul P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 45(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 15708697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.
    Grines C; Patel A; Zijlstra F; Weaver WD; Granger C; Simes RJ;
    Am Heart J; 2003 Jan; 145(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 12514654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of survival after contemporary percutaneous coronary revascularization for acute myocardial infarction in the real world.
    Lee CH; van Domburg RT; Hoye A; Lemos PA; Tanabe K; Smits PC; van der Giessen WJ; de Feyter P; Serruys PW
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 16(11):627-31. PubMed ID: 15550731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is transport with platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition for primary percutaneous coronary intervention more efficient than on-site thrombolysis in patients with STEMI admitted to community hospitals? Randomised study. Early results.
    Dobrzycki S; Mezyński G; Kralisz P; Prokopczuk P; Nowak K; Kochman W; Zuk J; Bachórzewska-Gajewska H; Sawicki Z; Poniatowski B; Korecki J; Musiał WJ
    Kardiol Pol; 2006 Aug; 64(8):793-9; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 16981054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interhospital transport for primary angioplasty improves the long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction compared with immediate thrombolysis in the nearest hospital (one-year follow-up of the PRAGUE-1 study).
    Bednár F; Widimský P; Krupicka J; Groch L; Aschermann M; Zelízko M;
    Can J Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 19(10):1133-7. PubMed ID: 14532938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thrombolysis or primary angioplasty? Reperfusion therapy for myocardial infarction in the UK.
    Ratcliffe AT; Pepper C
    Postgrad Med J; 2008 Feb; 84(988):73-7. PubMed ID: 18322126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania province of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy.
    Dryja T; Kornacewicz-Jach Z; Goracy J; Przybycień K; Jodko L; Skowronek A; Kurowski M; Zinka E
    Kardiol Pol; 2006 Jun; 64(6):591-9; discussion 600-1. PubMed ID: 16810577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Acute myocardial infarct: thrombolysis of coronary angioplasty?].
    Rickenbacher P
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1998 Feb; 87(6):183-5. PubMed ID: 9531811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).
    Danchin N; Coste P; Ferrières J; Steg PG; Cottin Y; Blanchard D; Belle L; Ritz B; Kirkorian G; Angioi M; Sans P; Charbonnier B; Eltchaninoff H; Guéret P; Khalife K; Asseman P; Puel J; Goldstein P; Cambou JP; Simon T;
    Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 18591434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary angioplasty for myocardial infarction.
    Horrigan MC; Ellis SG
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1995; 7 Suppl F():47F-62F. PubMed ID: 10158395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
    Dalby M; Bouzamondo A; Lechat P; Montalescot G
    Circulation; 2003 Oct; 108(15):1809-14. PubMed ID: 14530206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A percutaneous coronary intervention-thrombolytic predictive instrument to assist choosing between immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.
    Kent DM; Ruthazer R; Griffith JL; Beshansky JR; Concannon TW; Aversano T; Grines CL; Zalenski RJ; Selker HP
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 18328842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term clinical outcomes after rescue angioplasty are not different from those of successful thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.
    Steg PG; Francois L; Iung B; Himbert D; Aubry P; Charlier P; Benamer H; Feldman LJ; Juliard JM
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Sep; 26(18):1831-7. PubMed ID: 15930039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis: the definite management of st elevation myocardial infarction.
    Martinez-Ojeda J; Martinez-Toro J
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 2005; 97(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 16599071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Establishing the effectiveness of coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.
    Weintraub WS; Ehrenthal D
    Am Heart J; 2008 Jan; 155(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 18082482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up.
    Ranjan A; Patel TM; Shah SC; Malhotra H; Patel R; Vayada N; Pothiwala R; Fonseca K; Tanwar NS
    Indian Heart J; 2005; 57(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 16521638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: insights from the RESCUE I, RESCUE II, and other contemporary clinical experiences.
    Ellis SG; Da Silva ER; Spaulding CM; Nobuyoshi M; Weiner B; Talley JD
    Am Heart J; 2000 Jun; 139(6):1046-53. PubMed ID: 10827386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis.
    Betriu A; Masotti M
    Am J Cardiol; 2005 Jan; 95(1):100-1. PubMed ID: 15619401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.