130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9796642)
1. Breast and cervical cancer screening interventions: an assessment of the literature.
Meissner HI; Breen N; Coyne C; Legler JM; Green DT; Edwards BK
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Oct; 7(10):951-61. PubMed ID: 9796642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening.
Yabroff KR; Kerner JF; Mandelblatt JS
Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):429-39. PubMed ID: 11006069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment, 1990-2000.
McNaughton-Collins M; Walker-Corkery E; Barry MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2004; (33):78-101. PubMed ID: 15504921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study.
Hiatt RA; Pasick RJ; Stewart S; Bloom J; Davis P; Gardiner P; Johnston M; Luce J; Schorr K; Brunner W; Stroud F
Prev Med; 2001 Sep; 33(3):190-203. PubMed ID: 11522160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obesity and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women: a review.
Cohen SS; Palmieri RT; Nyante SJ; Koralek DO; Kim S; Bradshaw P; Olshan AF
Cancer; 2008 May; 112(9):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18361400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Descriptive review of the literature on breast cancer outcomes: 1990 through 2000.
Mandelblatt J; Armetta C; Yabroff KR; Liang W; Lawrence W
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2004; (33):8-44. PubMed ID: 15504918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Community-based cancer screening programs in older populations: making progress but can we do better?
Curbow B; Bowie J; Garza MA; McDonnell K; Scott LB; Coyne CA; Chiappelli T
Prev Med; 2004 Jun; 38(6):676-93. PubMed ID: 15193888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Promoting cancer screening: Learning from experience.
Meissner HI; Smith RA; Rimer BK; Wilson KM; Rakowski W; Vernon SW; Briss PA
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5 Suppl):1107-17. PubMed ID: 15316913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC
Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: selected states, 2003 to 2004.
Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Subramanian S; Tangka FK; Bapat B; Richardson LC
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):626-35. PubMed ID: 18157831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening.
Zapka JG; Taplin SH; Solberg LI; Manos MM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jan; 12(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 12540497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in abnormal cancer screening results in the United States of America.
Yabroff KR; Freedman A; Brown ML; Ballard-Barbash R; McNeel T; Taplin S
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 17626704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of study methods in individual- and group-level HIV intervention research: critical reporting elements.
Flores SA; Crepaz N;
AIDS Educ Prev; 2004 Aug; 16(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 15342336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do cervical cancer screening patient information leaflets meet the HPV information needs of women?
Hall B; Howard K; McCaffery K
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jul; 72(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 18372144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of clinical reports on behavioral interventions for hypertension.
Boulware LE; Daumit GL; Frick KD; Minkovitz CS; Lawrence RS; Powe NR
Prev Med; 2002 Apr; 34(4):463-75. PubMed ID: 11914053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using lay health advisors to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas: a review.
MartÃnez-Donate AP
WMJ; 2009 Aug; 108(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 19743759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
