BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9796649)

  • 1. Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms.
    Scollie SD; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Jenstad LM
    Ear Hear; 1998 Oct; 19(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 9796649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the 'real-ear to dial difference' to derive real-ear SPL from hearing level obtained with insert earphones.
    Munro KJ; Lazenby A
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Oct; 35(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 11824532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the "coupler to dial difference" and the "real ear to coupler difference".
    Munro KJ; Davis J
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 12677107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance.
    Munro KJ; Hatton N
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10708074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations.
    Munro KJ; Buttfield LM
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15937410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips.
    O'Brien A; Keidser G; Yeend I; Hartley L; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 20812890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
    Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference: Physical and Perceptual Differences.
    Jorgensen L; Barrett R; Jedlicka D; Messersmith J; Pratt S
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 31(4):1088-1097. PubMed ID: 36037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-Ear to coupler difference in patients with ear drum perforation.
    Liu TC; Lin KN
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 10545809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.