These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9796649)

  • 41. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.
    Bagatto M; Moodie S; Scollie S; Seewald R; Moodie S; Pumford J; Liu KP
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):199-226. PubMed ID: 16424946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relationship of Head Circumference and Age in the Prediction of the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference (RECD).
    Watts KM; Bagatto M; Clark-Lewis S; Henderson S; Scollie S; Blumsack J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):496-505. PubMed ID: 32119819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Applying the reference values of real-ear-to-coupler-difference for deaf and hard-of-hearing children in Taiwan: Cautions and considerations.
    Lin CY; Chang YP; Ma YJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295236. PubMed ID: 38039315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Validation of an integrated pressure level measured earmold wideband real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement.
    Urichuk M; Purcell D; Allen P; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Sep; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 37722804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Predicting children's real-ear-to-coupler differences based on tympanometric data.
    McCreery RW; Crukley J; Grindle A; Merchant GR; Walker E
    Int J Audiol; 2023 May; 62(5):462-471. PubMed ID: 36752672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Real-ear-to-coupler difference predictions as a function of age for two coupling procedures.
    Bagatto MP; Scollie SD; Seewald RC; Moodie KS; Hoover BM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Sep; 13(8):407-15. PubMed ID: 12371658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hearing thresholds, threshold repeatability, and attenuation values for passive noise-reducing earphone enclosures.
    Frank T; Greer AC; Magistro DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):772-8. PubMed ID: 9373922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparisons among SPLs in real ears, 2 cm3 and 6 cm3 couplers.
    Hawkins DB; Cooper WA; Thompson DJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):154-61. PubMed ID: 2132599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of hearing aid users.
    Munro KJ; Howlin EM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 19745743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children and adults.
    Barlow NL; Auslander MC; Rines D; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1988 Oct; 9(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 3224771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Hearing aid coupler output level variability and coupler correction levels for insert earphones.
    Frank T; Richards WD
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 1916048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Interaural attenuation for tubephone insert earphones.
    Sklare DA; Denenberg LJ
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):298-300. PubMed ID: 3678645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Variation of young normal-hearing thresholds measured using different audiometric earphones: implications for the acoustic coupler and the ear simulator.
    Lawton BW
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):444-51. PubMed ID: 16149239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An evaluation of the CARL manikin for use in "patient-free" real ear measurement: consistency and comparison to normative data.
    Folkeard P; Alam M; Koch R; Abbasalipour P; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 35343874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.