176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9796798)
1. Surviving misconduct is one thing, accountability is another.
Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):727. PubMed ID: 9796798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. International recruitment highlights need to track scientific behaviour.
Dalton R
Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):107-8. PubMed ID: 8774871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fraud claims shake German complacency.
Abbott A
Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):750. PubMed ID: 9194549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Conflict of interest in human research ethics.
Jones DJ
NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 11654611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?
Luft P; Sprague RL
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 11653391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sharing scientific data II: normative issues.
Weil V; Hollander R
IRB; 1990; 12(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Wellcome Trust sets out fresh misconduct standards.
Klarreich E
Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6848):667. PubMed ID: 11507596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institute Pasteur to adopt 'automatic' misconduct process.
Butler D
Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6516):647. PubMed ID: 7854426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
Bostanci A
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing a Tri-Council code of conduct for research involving humans.
Rolleston F; Armour C; Stipich N
J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11655381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct. Scandals shake Chinese science.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1464-6. PubMed ID: 16763127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Germany. Fraud investigations come up dry.
Vogel G
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):150. PubMed ID: 12855778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing guidelines on conflict of interest.
Parmley WW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(6):1749-50. PubMed ID: 11345394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accountability in science and government: is access the answer?
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 10862368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research on hire.
Gupta AS
Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(4):111-3. PubMed ID: 16334912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
